Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 [2]

Author Topic: My experience with a low-population fort  (Read 2184 times)

Massam

  • Bay Watcher
  • Wait...you're putting me in charge?!?!?
    • View Profile
Re: My experience with a low-population fort
« Reply #15 on: September 14, 2008, 10:08:23 am »

M fortress always gets thrown off by the first immigration. Of course,I am a newb so...Yeah they shouldn't come till you're self-sustaining, or at close to that point.
Logged

efraker

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: My experience with a low-population fort
« Reply #16 on: September 14, 2008, 01:21:23 pm »

This sounds kind of fun, I may give this a shot.
Logged

dyze

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: My experience with a low-population fort
« Reply #17 on: September 14, 2008, 02:34:51 pm »

i always use a low pop cap, since i tend to loose control over my fortress once it grows too large. half the population with no job etc.
im totally for difficulty settings. especially an 'easy' setting  ;D, where immigrants would arrive far more slowly.
Logged

Tormy

  • Bay Watcher
  • I shall not pass?
    • View Profile
Re: My experience with a low-population fort
« Reply #18 on: September 14, 2008, 05:15:15 pm »

i always use a low pop cap, since i tend to loose control over my fortress once it grows too large. half the population with no job etc.
im totally for difficulty settings. especially an 'easy' setting  ;D, where immigrants would arrive far more slowly.

Well thats no problem. Once the Army Arc will be implemented, you will just draft all unused dwarves into your army, and send them out to conquer! [or fail badly..] ;D
Logged

Alabaster

  • Bay Watcher
  • "ezum Boltlove, Hale Disemboweler of Direction"
    • View Profile
Re: My experience with a low-population fort
« Reply #19 on: September 14, 2008, 08:54:58 pm »

i always use a low pop cap, since i tend to loose control over my fortress once it grows too large. half the population with no job etc.
im totally for difficulty settings. especially an 'easy' setting  ;D, where immigrants would arrive far more slowly.

I find the waves of imigrants make things more difficult.  The original 7 and the first wave are the easiest, but when you get useless imigrants like another 3 dyers and a potash maker in a 8 dwarf wave before you get bedrooms made, or are busy juggling other issues, like repelling ambushes.

However repelling seiges with just your 7 or a lowpop fort of 10 or so would be interesting.  Without traps it would make for some challenging strategy.
Logged

Charlemagne

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
    • Justice City Recovery Center
Re: My experience with a low-population fort
« Reply #20 on: September 14, 2008, 11:25:26 pm »

i always use a low pop cap, since i tend to loose control over my fortress once it grows too large. half the population with no job etc.
im totally for difficulty settings. especially an 'easy' setting  ;D, where immigrants would arrive far more slowly.

Seige nothing, Ambushes are dangerous enough. I lose at least one dwarf a season to ambushes. Oftentimes if there are no merchants around it's too dangerous to leave the fort. I can't keep a champion alive for over a year.

I find the waves of imigrants make things more difficult.  The original 7 and the first wave are the easiest, but when you get useless imigrants like another 3 dyers and a potash maker in a 8 dwarf wave before you get bedrooms made, or are busy juggling other issues, like repelling ambushes.

However repelling seiges with just your 7 or a lowpop fort of 10 or so would be interesting.  Without traps it would make for some challenging strategy.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]