Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Soulwynd]

http://thelist.roguelikedevelopment.org/

*cough*

[Neonivek]

The list needs descriptions... and ratings...

[Soulwynd]

Ratings? Why would you base yourself in ratings? Furthermore, who would rate them? Would you believe them? If it was a mass collection of votes, I find people to be -=STUPID=- so why would I believe a bunch of people to rate games for me?

Oh well, if you really need that, make a site that has both.

[wallish]

I can't believe nobody has suggested Incursion yet.
http://www.incursion-roguelike.net/

It's very fun very well made roguelike where you can do all kinds of fun stuff. There are a few bugs around still that can be irritating but it's still very fun.

I should point out that right now it only has one very large very fun dungeon, but that probably won't really matter to you.

But is it fun?

[Another]

Nearly all the worthy roguelikes are already mentioned. If you didn't hear about it - try GearHead1. It has several really unique features. I don't know if you can compile its pascal code under Mac though. Doesn't Mac have emulators like dosbox or wine anyway?

[Neonivek]

Ratings? Why would you base yourself in ratings? Furthermore, who would rate them? Would you believe them? If it was a mass collection of votes, I find people to be -=STUPID=- so why would I believe a bunch of people to rate games for me?

Oh well, if you really need that, make a site that has both.

It is just that... with that site... Id have to dig through a bunch of REALLY BAD roguelikes to get fun ones

My favorite Freeware site... that had ratings and a description... went under

[Narushima]

ADOM has a great overworld but I hate the controls so much that I can't play it.

I especially like the controls in this game. They're simple and easily remembered, unlike a lot of other ones.

[Soulwynd]

Ratings? Why would you base yourself in ratings? Furthermore, who would rate them? Would you believe them? If it was a mass collection of votes, I find people to be -=STUPID=- so why would I believe a bunch of people to rate games for me?

Oh well, if you really need that, make a site that has both.

It is just that... with that site... Id have to dig through a bunch of REALLY BAD roguelikes to get fun ones

My favorite Freeware site... that had ratings and a description... went under

I could quickly whip up a site with ratings, self controlled descriptions, etc. The only problem would be getting people to use it.

I like that site because it's somewhat well updated, I get to browse things myself and I find most rogue-likes to be good by default.

[Yaddy1]

I would use it... (and yes mac has dosbox)

[cowofdoom78963]

I use that list all the time, I found just about every rouge I play there. Personaly though I like it better without ratings. Its just a list, its not some biased review site.

[Yaddy1]

what I would like would be if it said platforms and descriptions. With ratings and comments people who can't believe that a game doesn't have graphics would just be stupid.

[Neonivek]

Then how about a Rating system out of 2 or 3...

Without a rating system then you need an in depth description...