Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 105 106 [107] 108 109 ... 148

Author Topic: The NEW Future of the Fortress  (Read 352966 times)

Zeful

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: The NEW Future of the Fortress
« Reply #1590 on: January 15, 2009, 02:10:34 am »

I just wondered a very specific thought.

Is Toady actually just coding details and then having them pass on, or is he making a DNA substitute for Dwarf Fortress? I know the RAWS apparently don't seem to have anything apparently confusing in them, but the way the game interprets them...
Code: [Select]
DF=DF  ; Dwarf -=- Dwarf  - Species
BR=GD  ; Brown -=- Gold  - Hair
BL=BL  ; Blue -=- Blue  - Eyes
...etc...

It could pose some very... interesting offspring when modded//hacked, like Half Dwarf/Half Magmaman.

Of course any result from having such a complicated system for values would only be way way way further down the line of development
This seems like a 50/50 thing. Hard to initialize but easy to code. You could take the system we have now for creatures and change it.

For example the parts of a dwarven body now are
Code: [Select]
HUMANOID:2EYES:2EARS:NOSE:2LUNGS:HEART:GUTS:ORGANS:HUMANOID_JOINTS:THROAT:NECK:SPINE:BRAIN:5FINGERS:5TOES:MOUTHA simple genetic code setup could be
Code: [Select]
X:X;DF:DF;BLU:Grn;LRG:sml;HK:but;CLN:CLN;STR:STR;low:HIGH;stf:stf;DMB:smt;AGL:clm With caps as dominate, lower case as recessive and split is shared dominate. Of course you would have to code the genetic order into the creature so that the line would have the proper context and everything, but once the framework is created it shouldn't be to hard.
Logged

PTTG??

  • Bay Watcher
  • Kringrus! Babak crulurg tingra!
    • View Profile
    • http://www.nowherepublishing.com
Re: The NEW Future of the Fortress
« Reply #1591 on: January 15, 2009, 11:49:04 am »

I have a feeling that the raws will be simplified into this:
ATCGTAGTAACACATGTGCATGGATVAVATCAGTCAGCTATTAGGCGATAATCGCGCGCGCTAATCGATCTTAACTGTTTAGGGCTATATATCTATATTGATTACA
That being the raw code for pointed ears.
« Last Edit: January 15, 2009, 02:30:53 pm by PTTG?? »
Logged
A thousand million pool balls made from precious metals, covered in beef stock.

Neonivek

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: The NEW Future of the Fortress
« Reply #1592 on: January 15, 2009, 11:53:21 am »

I have a feeling that the raws will be simplified into this:
ATCGTAGTAACACATGTGCATGGATVAVATCAGTCAGCTATTAGGCGATAATCGCGCGCGCTAATCGATCTTAACTGTTTAGGGCTATATATCTATATTGATTACA
That being the raw code for pointed ears.

The joke here being that you can spell the movie "Gataka" (or however it is spelled). Which was a movie of unnatural selection! (Basically those born without altered genes were ostracized and forced to be janitors).

What do you do if there are 4 genes for eyes at once?
Logged

Sowelu

  • Bay Watcher
  • I am offishially a penguin.
    • View Profile
Re: The NEW Future of the Fortress
« Reply #1593 on: January 15, 2009, 01:40:50 pm »

The movie 'GATTACA' was named after sequences like these, with these four letters being the standard way of representing genetic sequences.

And if you really want to mess with genes, try crossbreeding plants in A Tale in the Desert.  It's a huge headache to map out genomes, and to figure out what compounds will move what parts to where.  But it's also very satisfying to add like five copies of an "increase flax production" sequence to a flax plant's genome.  I love that part of it.
« Last Edit: January 15, 2009, 01:42:45 pm by Sowelu »
Logged
Some things were made for one thing, for me / that one thing is the sea~
His servers are going to be powered by goat blood and moonlight.
Oh, a biomass/24 hour solar facility. How green!

CobaltKobold

  • Bay Watcher
  • ☼HOOD☼ ☼ROBE☼ ☼DAGGER☼ [TAIL]
    • View Profile
Re: The NEW Future of the Fortress
« Reply #1594 on: January 15, 2009, 10:41:11 pm »

XX as female and XY as male is ours, but there're other sex-determination chromosome patterns on Earth.

ex: Chickens: ZZ male, ZW female
Logged
Neither whole, nor broken. Interpreting this post is left as an exercise for the reader.
OCEANCLIFF seeding, high z-var(40d)
Tilesets

Duke 2.0

  • Bay Watcher
  • [CONQUISTADOR:BIRD]
    • View Profile
Re: The NEW Future of the Fortress
« Reply #1595 on: January 15, 2009, 10:45:26 pm »


 Also note, some frogs have three sex-determining genes known as X, Y and Z.

 I think Toady wants to keep them a bit more abstracted this time around. If there is a genome, it would likely be hidden. Genes are very efficient at storing data, but not so easy to modify. The RAW's would be much better as they are.
Logged
Buck up friendo, we're all on the level here.
I would bet money Andrew has edited things retroactively, except I can't prove anything because it was edited retroactively.
MIERDO MILLAS DE VIBORAS FURIOSAS PARA ESTRANGULARTE MUERTO

Neonivek

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: The NEW Future of the Fortress
« Reply #1596 on: January 15, 2009, 10:49:41 pm »

What about mutations?

That is mostly the reason I don't think the game should EXACTLY follow genetics.

It allows for much more interesting offspring and greater changes over time.
Logged

Aqizzar

  • Bay Watcher
  • There is no 'U'.
    • View Profile
Re: The NEW Future of the Fortress
« Reply #1597 on: January 16, 2009, 06:15:40 am »

Weighty stuff in the devlog.

Mud and blood splatters have definite volumes now, so they can only spread so far, and now when to form pools and blobs based on amounts.  Very cool.  I think blood fountains might actually be a reality soon.

Also, nerve damage.  I guess so you can roleplay that one Bond villain who couldn't feel pain.

Gonna be lots of new fun things to deal with as an Adventurer.
Logged
And here is where my beef pops up like a looming awkward boner.
Please amplify your relaxed states.
Quote from: PTTG??
The ancients built these quote pyramids to forever store vast quantities of rage.

Tormy

  • Bay Watcher
  • I shall not pass?
    • View Profile
Re: The NEW Future of the Fortress
« Reply #1598 on: January 16, 2009, 07:28:09 am »

What about mutations?

That is mostly the reason I don't think the game should EXACTLY follow genetics.

It allows for much more interesting offspring and greater changes over time.

Greater changes over time? I guess the worldgen must run for thousands of years if we would like to see "greater changes". It's not impossible of course, even with the current worldgen it shouldn't be problematic.


Also, nerve damage.  I guess so you can roleplay that one Bond villain who couldn't feel pain.

Yeah, and let's don't forget about Fortress mode also. We can mod in a "robocop" race even, if you know what I mean.  :D
« Last Edit: January 16, 2009, 07:30:11 am by Tormy »
Logged

Kishmond

  • Bay Watcher
  • What the pfargtl?
    • View Profile
    • My DF Stories blog.
Re: The NEW Future of the Fortress
« Reply #1599 on: January 16, 2009, 08:08:58 am »

There's already a modded race of superbots, if thet's what you're looking for.

mendonca

  • Bay Watcher
  • [CLIVE]
    • View Profile
Re: The NEW Future of the Fortress
« Reply #1600 on: January 16, 2009, 09:08:49 am »



And if you really want to mess with genes, try crossbreeding ants in It Came From The Desert

This is what I read first time round ...
Logged

Granite26

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: The NEW Future of the Fortress
« Reply #1601 on: January 16, 2009, 09:47:16 am »

Greater changes over time? I guess the worldgen must run for thousands of years if we would like to see "greater changes". It's not impossible of course, even with the current worldgen it shouldn't be problematic.

Why?  Mutation rate is variable.  Right now, Earth has something like 10^-4 to 10^-6 mutations per base pair per generation (people have 23 pairs)


There's not reason not to up it to 1% chance of mutation per 'gene' per generation, although you'd have to define mutation...  Color would be easy (RG or B value * .75-1.25 on mutation)

Dareon Clearwater

  • Bay Watcher
  • [PREFSTRING:colorful underwear]
    • View Profile
Re: The NEW Future of the Fortress
« Reply #1602 on: January 16, 2009, 10:17:00 am »

Also, nerve damage.  I guess so you can roleplay that one Bond villain who couldn't feel pain.
Or Thomas Covenant.

Hmm. ¤White Gold Ring¤.
Logged
It's like you're all trying to outdo each other in sheer useless pedantry.

Mel_Vixen

  • Bay Watcher
  • Hobby: accidently thread derailment
    • View Profile
Re: The NEW Future of the Fortress
« Reply #1603 on: January 16, 2009, 10:22:49 am »

As long i suffocate to death cause i am covered with golddust. Hehehe.

Well toady can you give us an example how the tags for the genetics look?
Logged
[sarcasm] You know what? I love grammar Nazis! They give me that warm and fuzzy feeling. I am so ashamed of my bad english and that my first language is German. [/sarcasm]

Proud to be a Furry.

Hectonkhyres

  • Bay Watcher
  • Has a Fetish for Skulking Filth-
    • View Profile
Re: The NEW Future of the Fortress
« Reply #1604 on: January 16, 2009, 11:05:59 am »

And if you really want to mess with genes, try crossbreeding ants in It Came From The Desert
This is what I read first time round ...
Now that is a movie I expect to see on the Scifi Channel.
Also, I now have an urge to hybridize dwarves and pea plants just to see what happens.
Logged
And now the thread is about starfish porn.
...originally read that as 'perpetual motion pants' and thought how could I have missed this??
Pages: 1 ... 105 106 [107] 108 109 ... 148