Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Poll

Are the current sociopathic canabalistic elves better than before, or worse?

Elves have become the true and awesome avatars of Armok
- 71 (48.3%)
It's hard to be worse than the where...
- 18 (12.2%)
I like the idea, but the're unbalanced now.
- 41 (27.9%)
ARRGH THEY ARE EATING MY BRAIN AND I AM NOT HAPPY ABOUT IT
- 17 (11.6%)

Total Members Voted: 147


Pages: 1 [2] 3 4

Author Topic: Elves: better or worse?  (Read 4106 times)

Erk

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Elves: better or worse?
« Reply #15 on: July 16, 2008, 05:55:15 am »

I'd have to say as they are now, the elves are chaotic neutral at best. No good-aligned creature would be so happy to slaughter other good aligned creatures.
Logged
'River' cancels eat: Food is problematic.

FZeroRacer

  • Escaped Lunatic
    • View Profile
Re: Elves: better or worse?
« Reply #16 on: July 16, 2008, 06:01:50 am »

I'd have to say as they are now, the elves are chaotic neutral at best. No good-aligned creature would be so happy to slaughter other good aligned creatures.
That's the thing, with how their god supports nature and how they honestly believe they are doing the world a service, they would be classified as "Chaotic Good" in their own warped little world. Outside of that, they would be considered Chaotic Evil most likely.
Logged

SeaBee

  • Bay Watcher
  • Wolves are atheists
    • View Profile
Re: Elves: better or worse?
« Reply #17 on: July 16, 2008, 06:02:34 am »

I absolutely love the current take on elves. They're nature lovers that EAT YOUR FRIENDS -- a far cry from the wussy, whining nobodies that cry about everything while trying to be all diplomatic while I snicker at them and continue raping the forests.

Now they cry about the trees and snack on your entrails when you start laughing at them.
Logged

Jamuk

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Elves: better or worse?
« Reply #18 on: July 16, 2008, 08:26:53 am »

Yeah, if elves get changed back I am definitely going into the raws and breaking them again, they're just too awsome now.
Logged

Rilder

  • Bay Watcher
  • Rye Elder
    • View Profile
Re: Elves: better or worse?
« Reply #19 on: July 16, 2008, 08:32:58 am »

Toady should just add a bit of randomization to there personalities.

So in some maps elves are nice down to earth peeps who never war dec anybody and don't eat people, while in other maps... OH GODS THERE EATING MAH BRAINS.
Logged
Steam Profile
Youtube(Let's Plays), Occasional Streaming
It felt a bit like a movie in which two stoners try to steal a military helicopter

umiman

  • Bay Watcher
  • Voice Fetishist
    • View Profile
Re: Elves: better or worse?
« Reply #20 on: July 16, 2008, 08:56:32 am »

I'm not sure what you guys are talking about. I've yet to see any of my genned worlds with elven supremacy... or anything even close to it. They either get enslaved by humans, enslaved by goblins (after initiating the war), or beat each other into oblivion.

Sure, they attack with idiotic numbers, but they still lose. Maybe it's because... THEY SUCK!

Wiles

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Elves: better or worse?
« Reply #21 on: July 16, 2008, 08:58:39 am »

I'd have to say as they are now, the elves are chaotic neutral at best. No good-aligned creature would be so happy to slaughter other good aligned creatures.

Good and evil are a matter of perspective. To the elves, humans are animal murdering, tree slaughtering fiends that deserve to be punished for the atrocities they commit.
Logged

Retro42

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Elves: better or worse?
« Reply #22 on: July 16, 2008, 08:59:39 am »

I like the change.  Turns the elves from wussy tree huggers to a more Sidhe or Fair Folk race.  Still nature lovers...just don't piss them off.
Logged

LeoLeonardoIII

  • Bay Watcher
  • Plump Helmet McWhiskey
    • View Profile
Re: Elves: better or worse?
« Reply #23 on: July 16, 2008, 11:17:12 am »

I can't wait until I get to see an elf caravan guard rush a skelk and take it down, and eat it.

Mmm. Boney.
Logged
The Expedition Map
Basement Stuck
Treebanned
Haunter of Birthday Cakes, Bearded Hamburger, Intensely Off-Topic

MMad

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Elves: better or worse?
« Reply #24 on: July 16, 2008, 01:03:05 pm »

Their morals feel inconsistent to me at the moment (they happily eat goblins, but get pissed if I make bone bolts out of one?) but I'm all for elves being more rabid and crazy, in an alien kind of way. I'd love it if the whole beastfolk alliance thing showed up in gameplay as well.

They really should be buffed, though, the way they get slaughtered in world get battles now is kinda silly. Sure, they may only have wooden weapons, but with their enormous lifespans they should all be legendary fighters, with masterful equipment. Then you'd see the true fury of nature... :)
Logged
"Ask not what your fortress can do for you - ask what you can do for your fortress."
Unapologetic ASCII abolitionist.

Cajoes

  • Bay Watcher
  • "I'm a damn cat."
    • View Profile
    • http://none
Re: Elves: better or worse?
« Reply #25 on: July 16, 2008, 02:35:35 pm »

Masterful wood is still, yannow, wood.
Logged
Quote from: Roman Proverb
Do not argue against the sun. For it is a lot brighter than you are.

Kagus

  • Bay Watcher
  • Olive oil. Don't you?
    • View Profile
Re: Elves: better or worse?
« Reply #26 on: July 16, 2008, 02:37:12 pm »

But with the masterful quality modifier, it's as strong as iron.

SirPenguin

  • Bay Watcher
  • NEVER A DULL MOMENT IN MID-WORLD
    • View Profile
Re: Elves: better or worse?
« Reply #27 on: July 16, 2008, 03:01:02 pm »

I like the rabid/crazy Elves, and I think it gives them a much more unique personality.

What I think needs to happen is for Elves to have a better defined "territory". Are forests named? If not, they should be, and Elves should stick to it...and only it. Make them very territorial, so that if a Human/Dwarf/Goblin starts chopping away, then they invade and devour and blah blah blah. But they should rarely WANT to leave their forest.
Logged

Christes

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Elves: better or worse?
« Reply #28 on: July 16, 2008, 03:23:16 pm »

I like the rabid/crazy Elves, and I think it gives them a much more unique personality.

What I think needs to happen is for Elves to have a better defined "territory". Are forests named? If not, they should be, and Elves should stick to it...and only it. Make them very territorial, so that if a Human/Dwarf/Goblin starts chopping away, then they invade and devour and blah blah blah. But they should rarely WANT to leave their forest.

I like this actually.  If this is combined with more aggressive goblins (or perhaps humans and dwarves who are more willing to fight goblins over child-snatching and whatnot), I think we'd have a decent compromise.

I think the eating of sapient beings by elves is actually very fitting.  Post-battle cannibalism is certainly document among many American tribes (who, most people would think, were quite "in-tune" with nature)
Logged

Zemat

  • Bay Watcher
  • Zemat, programmer, cancels coding: Too insane.
    • View Profile
Re: Elves: better or worse?
« Reply #29 on: July 16, 2008, 03:57:56 pm »

I don't have too much trouble with elves being cannibalistic and such but as they stand now it's too much cognitive dissonance for me. I would prefer goblins to be the the ones starting wars all the time and eating the fallen foes instead of being a parody of 18th century USA by being at the same time a race melting pot and a slavery tolerating nation and being friendly with everyone except with themselves.

Also, I know elves supposedly eat corpse just to not waste the meat but one thing is recovering the corpses from the battlefield to do something with them after the battle and the other is eating them while fighting like zombies.

By the way. Elves aren't supposed to like sex that much.
« Last Edit: July 16, 2008, 04:00:29 pm by Zemat »
Logged
You too can help bring to life the RogueLife Project!
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4