Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Author Topic: Dwarf Tweak non Vista?  (Read 1623 times)

TerminatorII

  • Bay Watcher
  • [PREFSTRING:Adamantine Skeleton]
    • View Profile
Dwarf Tweak non Vista?
« on: June 18, 2008, 04:39:05 am »
I can't get Tweak to run on my vista machine. I have Microsoft .Net framework 3.5 but Tweak crashes instantly on running. Any solutions?


Thanks!
Logged
No, I think the cook would be in charge of sugar-coating the cows.

You are a lifesaver! Round and probably in tropical flavors.

Jay

  • Bay Watcher
  • ☼Not Dead Yet☼
    • View Profile
Re: Dwarf Tweak non Vista?
« Reply #1 on: June 18, 2008, 10:57:18 pm »
As I recall 3.5 does not install 2.0, which is odd, yes, but probably the cause.
Logged
Mishimanriz: Histories of Pegasi and Dictionaries

TerminatorII

  • Bay Watcher
  • [PREFSTRING:Adamantine Skeleton]
    • View Profile
Re: Dwarf Tweak non Vista?
« Reply #2 on: June 18, 2008, 11:00:57 pm »
well someone needs to update the documentation for Tweak to tell everyone that they need to install .net 2 as well as 3.5
Logged
No, I think the cook would be in charge of sugar-coating the cows.

You are a lifesaver! Round and probably in tropical flavors.

Makrond

  • Bay Watcher
  • Like fuzzy dice, only more slicey
    • View Profile
Re: Dwarf Tweak non Vista?
« Reply #3 on: June 18, 2008, 11:04:18 pm »
Yeah, .NET 1.1, 2.0 and 3.5 are all completely independent of each other.
Logged
Quote from: Jusal
Darwinism? Bah! This is Dwarvinism!

TerminatorII

  • Bay Watcher
  • [PREFSTRING:Adamantine Skeleton]
    • View Profile
Re: Dwarf Tweak non Vista?
« Reply #4 on: June 19, 2008, 09:47:50 am »
Okay so I can only install version 3.5 on vista. IF Tweak requires earlier versions I can't run it. If this is the case could someone please make it only 3.5 dependant? and if it already is, why can't I run it?
Logged
No, I think the cook would be in charge of sugar-coating the cows.

You are a lifesaver! Round and probably in tropical flavors.

RP

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Dwarf Tweak non Vista?
« Reply #5 on: June 20, 2008, 06:26:40 am »
The .NET frameworks are independent of each other? I thought getting 3.5 would solve all me "this application requires .NET to be installed" woes. Oh well.
Logged

Andir

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Dwarf Tweak non Vista?
« Reply #6 on: July 02, 2008, 05:20:02 pm »
Quote from: RP on June 20, 2008, 06:26:40 am
The .NET frameworks are independent of each other? I thought getting 3.5 would solve all me "this application requires .NET to be installed" woes. Oh well.
Hahaha... omg.  Thanks for that laugh.
Logged
Quote from: Sergius on September 27, 2009, 02:08:49 pm
"Having faith" that the bridge will not fall, implies that the bridge itself isn't that trustworthy. It's not that different from "I pray that the bridge will hold my weight."

Untelligent

  • Bay Watcher
  • I eat flesh!
    • View Profile
Re: Dwarf Tweak non Vista?
« Reply #7 on: July 04, 2008, 09:04:42 pm »
I can install the other two .NET versions on Vista, but it still doesn't work...
Logged
Quote from: DrKillPatient on March 13, 2014, 11:26:58 pm
The World Without Knifebear — A much safer world indeed.
Quote from: Robocorn on July 16, 2010, 04:58:02 pm
regardless, the slime shooter will be completed, come hell or high water, which are both entirely plausible setbacks at this point.

Sergius

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Dwarf Tweak non Vista?
« Reply #8 on: July 10, 2008, 10:11:28 am »
I have 3.5 installed on Vista and Tweak works fine. Either 2.0 already comes with Vista or it got installed along with 3.5 (I'm pretty sure that's the case, I have 3.5 at work that I installed in a brand new computer with a fresh XP install and I can see 2.0 and 1.0 and 1.1-whatever on the add/remove programs.
Logged

Golgath

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
    • Avatar Source
Re: Dwarf Tweak non Vista?
« Reply #9 on: July 12, 2008, 01:25:40 am »
I've got tweak running on Vista as well, and it seems to run perfectly fine.  All I remember doing was installing 3.5.  Though it wasn't necessary on my machine, do you have DF running in admin mode?  If so, you might have to run tweak in admin mode as well so it is 'authorized' to mess with DF.  Otherwise, though, I've got no idea.  If all else fails, you can try random compatibility modes, though that should not be necessary.
Logged
Quote from: Grakelin on March 02, 2010, 04:28:07 pm
I fully endorse the idea of mountain goats that hunt man.