Imp: attacks and only considers imp/web interactions (badly at that). Selfish and bad read.
NJW: weirdly entangled in unrelated second win thoughts. Only considers NJW/web interactions (badly at that), calls 'lazy' - it's lazy that web only considers the NJW/web interactions, hah. Ignores that NJW considers web likely scum, focuses only on how bad it is that NJW considers web third party (which is not how I read NJW's statements on NJW's read on web). Selfish and bad read.
Sofa: Calls wildcard, does not mention Sofa's opinion on web, and wanted info from CM about sofa - why? CM claims to know stuff about sofa? I missed that, but here's rare mention of web thinking it's worth mentioning what someone thinks about someone-not-web. Calls sofa's current playstyle not helping town - I agree that it has very oblique value at best, and hurts more than it helps me, though it is possibly useful to use as radar to see how others interact. I hate sof's style, but find it NAI, but am fairly okay with web's read here.
FoU: Mentions FoU/Tric. Does not mention FoU/web interactions. My read of FoU is reasonably close.
CM: Revisits the CM/sof connection. Expects CM to make sof less insane. Says CM focused too much on web's powers, web's fault though, also says she's quieter than he likes. Seems conflicting and unclear, unrealistic, weird focus. Don't like this read.
Toonyman: Claims toonyman's having knowledge on web's role means toonyman can be proven. Proven - as what? I think Toons is town, but that's not any part of why I think so. Much focus in web's read on Toons based on web/Toons interaction, and admits bias. This isn't a read except how Toons benefits/can be used by web, this makes web look horrible to me.
MS: No details, 'fine and gotten better'. Admits bias, and I've observed MS's assistance and support of web in thread, which looks NAI of MS to me - meaning I can see any role MS doing this at this point. This isn't a read except how MS benefits/can be used by web.
Qua: Strongly supports. I think he's puffing up Qua's claim and setting Qua up for a 'you didn't follow through, so we kill you now' strike, as I read Qua's claim far more tentative and conditional than web - but 'I will refill Qua' is part of web's 'so don't elim me D1' defense, so I again think this isn't a read except how Toons benefits/can be used by web, this makes web look horrible to me. Especially because Qua's claim was 'maybe save Toony' - and Toony doesn't even have the situation Qua was going to be maybe saving Toony from anymore - again, refil Qua tonight is going to prevent a NK - does Qua agree with this? Because I don't think Qua said this - and I don't support D2 elim Qua because a NK happened despite web's 'refill of Qua'.
EP: Claims mindmelding with him, giving no specifics. This isn't a read, it's even less of a read than his other 'these are also not reads'.
TM: Claims easy to read, not sure has to explain more. Still not a read, but my read of TM is higher-end townie for D1, I'd let that slide -
But the whole of these reads looks very anti-town and low effort. They're all based on if the player benefits web. Also leaves out EuchreJack entirely.
Here's a comment on EJ:
I do not see how this can possibly be town EuchreJack.
The reason I don't think this is scumteam EJ is because of his early Day play. If you want to claim 3P Jack, fine, but that's all I can see.
But EJ has helpfully told web what color emerald EJ is willing to trade web when web wants it, and web wants EJ alive for now at least, or rather, 'would be slightly sad'.
And compare to this early statement of preference:
I would be okay voting out sofa, NJW, or Imp. I would not be sad if Crystal, Fallacy, or Max were voted. I would be slightly sad if Euchre was voted because he's definitely not teamed, but understand votes on him. I think any votes outside of these are bad.
Author
Topic: NQT's Choose-Your-Own-Spheres - -D3 - GAME OVER - TOWN VICTORY (Read 59173 times)