As mikekchar said it's more related to potential damage. You might think of squareness as your character's perception of how much damage your weapon will deal if you strike the target. Also, squareness is trying to take into account things like positioning of combatants, positioning of body parts, etc. All that is not usually very clear from just looking at the local map. So, you are getting a relative estimate of the end results, if. It's not a guarantee as that perception does not take into account the entire attack process.
The defender might dodge or parry making perceived squareness meaningless.
In your case reaching the point of the armor effectiveness check can render it meaningless. A "Very Square" attack on a lucky defender means you smack the armor squarely, the armor deflected the attack squarely, and no damage got through. A "Can't quite connect" attack on an unlucky defender means you get through the armor and deliver some hurt. I suspect the relatively low skill levels of the combatants you spawned are what's allowing the randomness factor in the armor check to dominate the results. Relatively low, as compared to such skills as most adventures quickly reach, or what militarized citizens obtain with even only a modest training program in fortress mode.
If nothing else your setup demonstrates how important armor is. Even the lower material quality iron armor is proving itself useful against a higher material quality steel weapon.
Now, feel free to chow down on a grain of salt. While my explanation might sound authoritative, I'm not (and am far from being) the resident expert on combat mechanics.
I thought I once read a post thoroughly detailing a step-by-step walk through of the melee attack process, highlighting the various interactions with lots of gloriously gory details as the player-base and community understand them. Even if I'm misremembering what never was someone ought to compile and post such. Such a guide might not reflect the exact algorithm Dwarf Fortress combat follows, but it would certainly help.
I have indeed heard that squareness affects damage, though it appears not to be through actual attack momentum, as momentum is more directly related to armor penetration.
I suppose that squareness as you suggest, might have to do with potential damage, but particularly in
what the strike damages. Mayhaps a grazing strike, even if the momentum is quite high because of the attack type and weapon, will only damage surface tissues, and not any organs. Or perhaps it has to do with penetration, so that an attack which technically has enough momentum to bisect a creature will instead only get through half of it.
Anyways, just from the limited testing I did, it doesn't appear that squareness has a consistent effect on armor penetration at all, which seems to indicate its effect is secondary. Which, I suppose, makes some sense... but also doesn't. If a stab is squarely against armor, shouldn't it have a higher chance to penetrate? The other factors in penetration are otherwise completely invisible.
As for information on combat, these posts:
http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=131995.135http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=142372.0Seem to give the most information on how momentum and penetration work. But they appear to be, in large part, outdated, as my calculations of some equations seem to indicate certain attacks to be unable to penetrate, when they can do so consistently. But I may have missed something in how the equations work.
Anyways, your comment gave me some leads on what to test next for research on this subject, so thank you. I'm trying to work on a mod which introduces new weapons and armor, so I'm doing research in order to practically balance weapons and weapon attacks. For instance, I would want to make penetrating iron mail with an iron sword difficult, requiring a heavy attack, even then having a chance to deflect, and a small chance for that same iron sword to penetrate a steel mail shirt. In particular, it seems very difficult to figure out how exactly momentum and armor volume are connected, though they apparently are. The combat formula on the wiki appeared erroneous in that regard. But more testing is required, and variables must be isolated.
I'll probably try to bring this general subject up at the Future of the Fortress, especially if I can get some good practical data on how this stuff works.
Author
Topic: What does squareness do in combat? (Read 688 times)