Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Author Topic: Compile the best walls of text for visualizing Myth&Magic, and procedural magic.  (Read 458 times)

dikbutdagrate

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile

So this is a weird one. 

It started out as a short response in Future of the Fortress, it then it turned into a wall of text which expounded on an example for what a procedural magic system might look like.  And well, now I'm here. 

This post isn't intended to be a suggestion for Tarn, which is pretty odd, but rather for the community.  The suggestion, so to speak, is to build a resource which helps expedite the transmission of certain ideas, which appear to have some difficulty in circulating.   

Anyway, in the incredibly vain hope that the community can preempt future questions concerning what magical subsystems might look like, and to what shape and variety they might possess come Myth&Magic, I am starting this thread to compile whatever the best illustrations and forum posts made thus far concerning procedural magic that appear to assist newer players in calibrating their understanding of what they may be looking forward to. (Maybe this belongs in the terrible suggestions thread, now that I think about it.)

If and as people post suggestions, I can edit and append them to the OP.


Heres the original drafted post, broken up into three segments:
Spoiler (click to show/hide)

Spoiler (click to show/hide)

Spoiler (click to show/hide)
« Last Edit: July 21, 2023, 12:58:39 am by dikbutdagrate »
Logged

voliol

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
    • Website

Seeing as how similar questions concerning the future of how procedural magic in DF will work continue to pop up without fail, on an almost monthly basis, perhaps Tarn's responses in interviews, dev logs, as well as the various community responses still haven't satisfied the meat of these questions?

I wonder. It might as well be that people for whatever reason don't read the older Tarn texts. The introductory post of the Future of the Fortress thread links to the development page, yet many questions are asked which are easily answered by said page both on Myth&Magic ("will we see different kinds of magical systems[?]" => "Generated skills and attributes to support diverse magic systems") and other future developments ("Do you intend to expand on diplomacy and maybe even visiting other locations with diplomats?" => "After the magic releases, we'll do a lot of foundational work culminating in starting scenarios for your fortresses. These changes touch upon law, property, status, diplomacy and so on").
Of course there is a lot more Tarn texts, like the DF Talks and comments at the end of Zach's stories, and interviews and so forth. The only way we non-developers can help in the FotF thread is by having consumed more Tarn texts than can be expected by any DF fan. But if people don't read the development page, which contains the skeleton of planned development/essentials, then I don't know if we can expect them to read a community-written wall of text.

Not that I blame anyone for not having read anything, it took me a while to find the DF Talks etc., and if they don't download the game from the Bay 12 website, then the devpage won't be as apparent either.

dikbutdagrate

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile

Seeing as how similar questions concerning the future of how procedural magic in DF will work continue to pop up without fail, on an almost monthly basis, perhaps Tarn's responses in interviews, dev logs, as well as the various community responses still haven't satisfied the meat of these questions?

I wonder. It might as well be that people for whatever reason don't read the older Tarn texts. The introductory post of the Future of the Fortress thread links to the development page, yet many questions are asked which are easily answered by said page both on Myth&Magic ("will we see different kinds of magical systems[?]" => "Generated skills and attributes to support diverse magic systems") and other future developments ("Do you intend to expand on diplomacy and maybe even visiting other locations with diplomats?" => "After the magic releases, we'll do a lot of foundational work culminating in starting scenarios for your fortresses. These changes touch upon law, property, status, diplomacy and so on").
Of course there is a lot more Tarn texts, like the DF Talks and comments at the end of Zach's stories, and interviews and so forth. The only way we non-developers can help in the FotF thread is by having consumed more Tarn texts than can be expected by any DF fan. But if people don't read the development page, which contains the skeleton of planned development/essentials, then I don't know if we can expect them to read a community-written wall of text.

Not that I blame anyone for not having read anything, it took me a while to find the DF Talks etc., and if they don't download the game from the Bay 12 website, then the devpage won't be as apparent either.

Yeh, you right.
Logged