Jimnosis.
2. The miller thing wasn't a gamblers fallacy thing, you definitely just misunderstood my point. Recently there has been a bunch of people pointing out (maybe it was Web maybe Shakerag, idk) that claiming miller is a good way to be seen as confirmed town. Web's the kind of player to fake claim milleras scum. That's all I'm saying there.
As the other main proponent of this movement, I want to remind you that, so far, I have fakeclaimed miller as town, scum,
and third-party, and I have explained why it's beneficial for all three, and not even just in a purely selfish way. Absolutely everyone should claim miller until its benefits have dwindled away from overuse.
I feel like not everyone, especially notquitethere, understands what EuchreJack is claiming, and I can see that web sees it, but he didn't clearly explain it. I was going to clearly explain it, but then I thought, is web not explaining it out of some kind of gambit? Maybe I should just leave it be.
People seem to be suggesting that this is Toaster’s meta, but… weak scumhunting and exaggerated-to-the-point-of-falsehood scumhunting are two different things. And I’m seeing the latter.
I don't disagree with you, but like... I think that
is Toaster's meta.
I said something to this effect in the last game you weren't in. He doesn't seem to be a bad player in general, to me, but he sometimes gets mired in weird procedural points that probably don't matter. Incidentally, this same tactic is something notquitethere uses
as mafia to justify an attack on someone, but I haven't seen Toaster do that.
It's not dissimilar to town EuchreJack, in a way, but more different.
ehhh, gonna stop it there.