Just the other day, a radio version of Fahrenheit 451 was repeated over here. Spoiler ( f you just happened to perhaps just to read it/etc yourself, for the first time), but at one point our hero manages to get away from the 'tracking dog' ...thing..., which is being live-broadcast chasing down its quarry as a sop to the masses who are still under the memetic yoke of the authorities and their bread-and-circuses.
So it (with its apparently 'infallible' tracking-and-identification ability) now goes and kills an unsuspecting completely unrelated guy out for a stroll (not a common activity[1], so probably not at all a big loss to the people in power[2]), thus sating the masses via this world's bread-and-circuses ideology.
((Ages since I read the book, and even longer since I saw the film of it, so not quite sure what maybe got abridged out, in this version, or changed away for the cinema. They didn't/couldn't do the 'dog' in the 1960s movie, did they? Probably something more filmable for the time.))
Anyway, due to timing alone, it struck me as a possibly apt parable here (((even before Cathar's own comment, just now)))... (Hopefully, for many, the rest of the plot isn't quite so mirroring of this modern scenario, with a hefty dose of bittersweet downer-ending.)
[1] When all 'right-minded people' (who aren't roving gangs of entitled adolescents, just as likely to kill anyone they don't like the look of) could be sitting in front of/within their wall-sized TVs watching this, the sanctioned entertainments or the news of the third(?) nuclear-armed war being on the brink.
[2] Might even have already been "on a watch list", and chose a bad time to be thinking independently? Hard to know exactly how hyper-competant the invisible regime might be, given their various apparent errors in dealing with the protagonist's under-the-heel/face-turn...