OK, so these two show words which don't appear at all. I'm treating pluralisations and different tenses as separate words:
boy do I really really love motorcycles
0/7
These motorcycles must be what god rides.
0/7
Motorbike that needs to have bits repaired.
also 0/7 but somehow closer.
Eliminated words:
be
bits
boy
do
god
have
I
love
motorbike
motorcycles
must
needs
really
repaired
rides
that
these
to
what
Which means we can eliminate some possibilities from the following:
A man repairs a motorcycle in garage
1/7
0/1 in the right place.
Bits of metal that might be motorcycles.
1/7
0/1 in the right place.
Motorcycles are a gift from the gods!
1/7
0/1 in the right place.
Fixing a broken wheel on a motorcycle.
1/7
0/1 in correct place.
Mechanic repairs the engine on my bike
1/7
1/1 in correct place.
Which means the phrase has to have
One of: [A/man/repairs/motorcycle/in/garage]
One of: [of/metal/might]
One of: [are/a/gift/from/the/gods]
One of: [Fixing/broken/wheel/on/a/motorcycle]
One of (in this exact place): [Mechanic/repairs/the/engine/on/my/bike]
Three of (one in correct place): [Parts/of/the/black/motorcycle/need/replacing]
One of [A/motorcycle/might/need/repairs/in/garage]
And none of the eliminated words
Working hypothesis: of/the/motorcycle are all to be included. Which means 'the' has to be in the third place, and motorcycle can't by in 2/5/7