I'm, honestly going to keep my vote on webadict right now. I feel they're trying to control the narrative.
Please show which game I don't try to control the narrative?
In fact, please show a game where I allow players to fight for no reason, and I turn out to be scum. Or, really, explain to me how I'm controlling the narrative in a negative way? Do you believe I should let players argue the entire thread instead of being "controlling"? I am, as always, at a loss for how when you use the logic in its opposite fashion. I do congratulate you that you are correct, I am, in fact, attempting to control discussion so that we don't get stuck at nothing, and yet... you don't identify that as a positive aspect, and I cannot identify why.
@Deus Asmoth: If you want to vote out Max, then you're doing a bad job at it. The more you are fighting over nothing, the more I don't want to vote him out, and the more I'll probably defend him.
I don't think he was for a No-lynch. I don't think he cares about the lynch result either way. If you want to know how that furthers the scum wincon, joining bandwagons is generally a way that scum players try to avoid suspicion. The only thing unusual about this one is that it was for a No-lynch rather than a player, but the concept is the same. That's why I think he played it off as him baiting (checks notes)... Jim, somehow... when it was obvious that most players weren't in favour of it.
Oh boy... Where to start...
Joining a bandwagon isn't inherently scummy. In fact, it's one of the only ways to actually win as a Town player. But, that's not really what Maximum Spin is doing. If anything, I'm the one that's bandwagoning, and that's really loosely using the term. Voting people for no reason is scummy, yes, but it's (1) Day 1, so there's a lot of leeway on what's acceptable, (2) NOT joining a bandwagon for no reason at all, and (3) expressing an idea for something that
you explicitly believe is the correct decision. Are you saying that joining what you think is the right decision is wrong? No, of course you're not. So, you must instead point out that the motivations behind that decision are wrong. His actions don't look like they have ill intent, so I don't think this is a viable method to attack Max.
Please stop.
Please tell me that you understand that openly ignoring someone's questions would be scummy as hell.
Ha ha ha, no, see, this is the point, you just haven't played with me before. I basically always do that.
You claiming to be bad at the game isn't actually a defence.
I have literally public acknowledged ignoring entire players as Town, I don't see this as a viable method of attack on Max. Not because he's doing that, but because you're egging him on for no reason, and he's actively trying to de-escalate.
Please stop.
Author
Topic: Kill Jim Jack Tric Now: Knightwing's Requested Revenge (3/7) End: Mafia Jim Wins (Read 19035 times)