Not legal advice. No one here is a client. If you take legal advice off the internet, then you are stupid. One size does not fit all. Contact a lawyer licensed in your state/country if you have legal issues.
Please No quoting. Thank you. This is based entirely off the information that has been supplied here by others and should not be relied upon by anyone for anything.
Before anything else.
True then; true now. Glad to see you growing still.
[reads all that.....] O wow.... You know this is all suspect as hell, right?
1.)
"Standard," does not exist. Period. No exceptions, and least of all in probate court. I have seen fortunes spent correcting "simple will" mistakes on "cheaper" preprinted forms. I think my old boss liked charging way more to fix other people's mistakes in that garbage than he would have just doing a will/trust. This quote is music to my ears, "someone here once told me there's no such thing as standard with this stuff, and I can read." That was me telling you that. Hi. I can't tell you how many morons have tried to go in front of a judge and say, "Uh, I thought it was standard." Moron #1 says this, and is followed by Moron #2 saying the exact opposite is also "standard." Reading matters. I am glad to see you doing that.
This is not standard. I do not do that, and I have not seen anyone I work with do that. Let me ask you something, if it is "standard," then what happens if/when your mom cannot be healthcare POA? Who takes over for her if she is "unwilling or unable?" Is it you? If not, who? How is this determined? Is it the "same" as that section you quoted? If not, why not, and how is that "standard?" I have no idea why anyone would list the successor executor/POA/whatever with such a blatant conflict. I am assuming you have a copy of this, seeing as you are sort of quoting/paraphrasing it. Do not post the will/documents in public, but just think about that to yourself when you hear that nonsense. Having no ability (or I'm sorry, desire) to read the whole thing, there may be other issues which cannot be determined if there are "mistakes" like that....
2.)
Untruth. I'm sorry but I call B.S. on uncle. If that was a drafting mistake in his original will right after it was made, he would have called up his lawyer and had it fixed. Especially if it was a drafting mistake he was completely unaware of. This has happened before, and it just got fixed as long as it was an honest drafting mistake (as opposed to somebody changed their mind for the umpteenth time, again, this week, and that revision costs $ so somebody finally makes up their mind). It can be a pain to get new witnesses/attestation and a certification where applicable, but on the rare occasion somebody legitimately messed up something in any office I was in, right after it was issued, we just fixed it/redid it. Whoever botched something may have gotten a stern talking to but.... If he does not want her 2nd in line.... This is fixable; if he does not fix it, then why not? Same reason he does not remove her entirely....
Additionally, I am wondering why any of this other nonsense is happening.
Let me get this straight, she ... talked him into disinheriting a special needs relative so she.... could be put in the will.... That's messed up. I'm sorry but wow. I just can't imagine how that conversation must have went. Something smells rotten in Denmark here. You are not being told the whole story.
3.)
Bypass for SNT Implementation Possibility (Special Needs Trust). Ask yourself and answer yourself quietly, if you are a substantial beneficiary/heir in his will? If not, why not (this is a lot of work and responsibility you will end up doing). If so, if/when you inherit things, you may consider establishing a special needs trust for the special needs relative. This is dependent upon several things. 1.) How big a pie slice mommy dearest managed to secure for herself in the will (thereby diverting funds from the special needs relative), 2.) If you can even possibly get anything sufficient to establish a special needs trust for the special needs relative, and 3.) Medicaid, etc.... Special needs trusts largely, legally shelter funds from Medicaid recovery for those with disabilities/special needs. This brings us to....
4.)
Medicaid spend down/recovery. You are correct on the 5 year lookback period (generally) and that the idea is to plan ahead. No idea why he is not. This could endanger a lot and end up with the state paid long before you/anyone else. I am a little shocked his lawyer did not bring this up with him. Makes me wonder if he is being stubborn/in denial it might happen to him. I've seen it before.
"Medicare [but mostly Medicaid) could wipe out just about all his assets if he ends up in a home without a trust." Other programs might too. However, you also need to know if he is on traditional Medicare (Parts A, B, and D), or a "Medicare Advantage" (Part C) (usually worse) plan. If you stay in this role, you are going to have to get to know him and how he does stuff.
5.)
Dealing with her. For whatever reason, uncle is unwilling to find somebody else to be healthcare POA. This makes no sense based upon what you have said. We called this, "setting up an avoidable conflict," as you previously indicated. Possibly unknowingly, uncle has put you in a hell of a position, by directly incentivizing her to get you to quit so she can rule. Frankly, is there a mechanism in writing for you to overrule her in this messed up situation (or are you just relying on state law, etc)? For that matter are there provisions requiring someone else to sign off on her healthcare decisions (e.g. a doctor or 3). Are you just supposed to rely on whatever legal mechanism (probate court, lawsuit etc), and if so will uncle's lawyer be handling that, presumably with the estate paying it? If not, are you supposed to just somehow manage this yourself?
Recap: This is a mess.
"Standard," is a lie. This is not standard. You are not being told the whole truth. Depending on several variables, it might be possible to do something for special needs relative. Medicaid spend down is important. Dealing with your mom is going to be a challenge. That said, is all of this worth it to do? If not, withdrawing will have costs, familial, social, and probably being written out of whatever will, etc. If so, then prepare to deal with her as best you can knowing it will be a mess. Also, if you leave, she takes over, from what you are saying.... If you stay, then you will have to out think, outfox and outmaneuver her. This will involve matters including but most definitely not limited to paper trails. If he wakes up and actually (unlikely) sees the need to replace her and do something about Medicaid spenddown, then who would take her place? If she stays in that role, what is the check and balance on her? Several, reasons to be concerned. It is regrettable you got put in this situation and there is no easy way out.
Not legal advice. No one here is a client. If you take legal advice off the internet, then you are stupid. One size does not fit all. Contact a lawyer licensed in your state/country if you have legal issues.
Please No quoting. Thank you. This is based entirely off the information that has been supplied here by others and should not be relied upon by anyone for anything.
Now if you'll excuse me, I have to be grumpy and work some more on Labor Day, due to a colleague's critical mass of stupid, but at least I'm getting credit for it this time.