I did forget. My gut says probably town, but my brain that you're doing an unusual amount of just summarising the thread, people's metas, past games, etc. Also, I do need to see some explanation for your judgements.
I'm assuming your vote is meant to be a pressure-vote, so I'm not going to ask for an explanation for it. Pressure-votes are generally accompanied by questions, but not doing that isn't out of character for you.
Jim & NJW2000 seem the most suspicious out of those voters, although NQT's computer mig be hacking my system.
Uh huh. Why? You've given a lot of information in the thread, but no analysis. I know you're generally helpful with votecounts and summaries, but you gotta show your reasoning too.
Fair enough.
So upon my review of TolyK, they don't seem to be obvious scum. They're hardly the most lurky, and they seemed to contribute something.
For example, we know that TolyK can remove negative abilities. In a role madness game, that sounds useful!
But apparently not, since nobody has taken TolyK up on the offer. Nor have folks really inquired much of it. It appears to have more than one use.
Yet they're being voted.
Now, until Web posted the votecount, I wasn't aware of just how little time we had, so that does prove a problem. But has TolyK's behavior fallen so much shorter than literally everyone else that they should get voted for working on Saturday?
So, upon that analysis, the question becomes "who is pushing this wagon?"
Tric sort of started it, jumped off, then jumped on. Tric doesn't seem to be pushing it, and might not even be committed to it.
@Tric: You committed to the TolyK wagon, or are you just committed to ANY wagon? Any other wagons looks like fun?
NQT is mostly justified in their vote. NQT asked TolyK a question that wasn't answered, so Standard Pressure Voting tactics is to continue that vote until the question is answered. In NQT's shoes, I'd be doing the same thing as town.
@NQT: Should TolyK appear, who are you going to vote?
Jim Groovester is suspicious because
I just don't buy his logic.He has a nice list of multiple people he's accusing of "not being active enough", yet TolyK at 4 votes is magically the most egregious.
@Jim: Anyone else worth your precious time to vote?
.
And you, NJW2000. You have two votes. With great power comes great responsibility. So I'm not buying your argument of "pressure voting" with 2 votes, when others are pressure voting with one vote. You have the subtlety of a witchfinder. To put it another way:
You have two fucking votes. You could be doing a lot more than just sheeping other players.