BUG REPORT (cont)
011 "You seem to be hunting for criticisable behaviour. "
Issuer: MaximumSpin
Report: Criticisable behaviour is apparently different from scum behaviour and so this unit is not sufficiently scumhunting.
Response: 1. It is early on Day One of this match, there is very little evidence to process. 2. Scum often disengage, attacking players on engagement issues is pro-game and catches scum. 3. If this was your real reason for voting this unit, you would be voting any of the many other players who have performed 0% hunting.
012 "Couple this with the use of this "high-effort" posting style that makes you seem engaged while actually only adding meaningless filler,"
Issuer: MaximumSpin
Report: This unit's personality module allows the illusion of activity.
Response: I am a robot.
Generated Questions
Question batch...005.
Jim Groovester - Your previous report stated Roden's vote on Tric was bad. Roden's vote has now changed. Which user has the worst vote in the game?
Juicebox - TricMagic thinks Toony's constant fakeclaims are scummy. What is your analysis?
Knightwing64 - Who is the least scummy user currently?
NJW2000 - Toony and Webadict are high volume users. Are there any signs you scan for to ascertain if they are scum?
I think they're just as alignment indicative as Web's, which is to say slightly townish. It's a common town tactic of theirs to muddle info so that it's harder for scum to tell who they should be targeting. One of his claims would have been hilarious if true, for reasons I may reveal later in the day.
I'm currently leaning town on Tric, Web, Max, and Jack, Toony, and Jim. I'm leaning neutral on Roden, and NJW, I need to see more from Knightwing, Nakeen, and of course Vector, and I'm currently leaning scum on NQT and TolyK.
TolyK hasn't said very much, and what they have said hasn't contributed very much to the gamestate. They've claimed an disabling ability but hasn't really contributed much beyond that. I get the feeling that the low activity may be due to being busy, but I feel like they've had enough time to form some opinion about the game, even if it's not a particularly in depth one.
I'm okay with the TolyK wagon, but I don't want to join it until they've had a chance to come back on and say something.
NQT has been a bit more active than TolyK, but I still feel as though they're activelurking. Most of their questions have been of a general sort, and they haven't really pushed on anyone at all. I feel as though they're trying to make it look as though they're engaging without really engaging.
While I do think that Roden's has had some flawed reasoning, I do like the way that they've been engaging so far.
NJW has made some good points, but I have a gut feeling that something's not right about them.
Web and Toony are both exhibiting behaviors that I've seen from them in previous town games.
I'm leaning town on Tric because looking at the evidence that Web gave for them being town it makes sense.
Max has been making some good posts, they given some good reads and even had a nice response to NQT's question.
Jim, is hard to read as ever, but my gut is saying that they're town right now.
NJW: Have you been able to form any reads based on what you've seen since your last post? What's your opinion on NQT right now?
NQT: Who is your top scumpick and why?
Nakeen: I understand that you may be busy and not have much time to post, but you need to make at least a little bit of effort to contibute to the game. You can start by answering NQT's question to you (quoted below for easy access) and then maybe your thoughts on the game so far.
Nakéen - [MISSED QUESTION] What is your assessment of Roden's claim regarding you being like an Innocent Child?
Do you think Max is scum? If not, then who do you suspect?
Knightwing:One, Max was mafia a little bit ago, making it unlikely for them to be mafia again.
This is called the Gambler's fallacy. As denoted by the name, this is faulty logic, and shouldn't be used to make a case that someone's not scum.
Do you have reads on anyone other than Max?
Author
Topic: FBYOR 5 - Game Over - Learning From Disaster, As All Ends In Fire And Darkness (Read 62338 times)