I feel like a broken record here:
I have reason to believe that at least one of the mafia can double-action.
That's cool and all, but it doesn't really matter. That's a fake possibility, not because it can't be true, but because that's more reason why they should be going after each other. It doesn't defend their actions but rather making fake boogeymen.
It just means that you can't trust anyone about anything. A typical tactic used to undermine trust. I'm not buying it because, if I did, I'd be right proper fucked I would. Why worry, when we can just vote out the two people who back up their fake Actions?
You're looking at your own role when you say that, because you see an Action that tells you if someone used one or more Actions. That's fine. I understand that. It's not necessarily right, but I get it. I think it allows for the possibility of Egan_BW being able to give an additional Action use to the Mafia. And even if it doesn't, well, they have to argue for why that it somehow precludes them from Actioning as well. It'd be even more reason to go after each other.
It's a fake position to take, and it doesn't preclude them from being Mafia.
Fou: if a track is used on a player A, and player A targets players B and C with a single action, and A is redirected from C to B, such that B is now targeted twice by that single action, does the track see A visit B once or twice?
A normal track will reveal which player or players the target visited. In the scenario you propose, the track would simply see A visit B in the redirection case, and see A visit B and C in the non-redirection case.
FoU: Does the user of Glass Lens (from Tric's flip) visit their target?
Yes.
FoU: Could you please show an example result from Glass Lens (from Tric's flip) being used on a Townie?
Night results: You performed your action.
Day end results: playername's alignment is Town.
"Oi, look at me, I'm roight again, ain't I?!"