He did. It was supposed to be a “disintegration” beam. Now he needs to see if he can reverse it’s effects before he tries it on himself.
That's not what we're testing. Were you not paying attention?
Oh, we’re not?
Based on
this, it seems that we just tested a “disintegration beam” that actually turned out to be just an invisibility beam. Also, King Zultan was talking about an invisibility beam. I’ve gone over the past three pages (I.e. the posts since Stirk’s last IC post), and I can see nothing to indicate that we were testing (or, even the existence of) an invisibility beam different from the one that was originally supposed to be a disintegration beam. Now, I may still have missed it so it would be nice if you could point it out to me (including providing a link to where this mysterious second invisibility beam was introduced).
On the other hand, I realize that there is a possibility that you mean that we’re testing something other than an invisibility beam. My comment that you replied to was in response to King Zultan. I informed him of the provenance of the invisibility beam (and the fact that it had already been shown to work), and gave my opinion that a portal seemed like a better option right now. Also, I don’t remember seeing anything to indicate that we had all agreed on a single course of action (I thought that consensus was still evolving, and that Stirk would carry out the action that had the most “votes” once the discussion died down). If we have all agreed to test something other than an invisibility beam, then perhaps you should have replied to King Zultan instead (and provided a link to where such agreement was reached). On the third hand, if you are just trying to shutdown discussion and force your “choice” on everyone else, then I don’t know what to say to you. I hope that’s not what’s happening…
Thank you, and have a nice day.