EuchreJack: What are you looking for? Let me break down the chain of events for you:
You could even put extra pressure on us by listing whom you DON'T want us to vote in Green. We'll assume you don't want yourself to be voted, so please chose someone else instead of yourself, if this is an option you would like to use.
I strongly object to a TolyK vote. He's reading town pretty hard to me. I've explained why I think you should lynch Maximum Spin.
I'm sorry, why is my name coming up? I've already full claimed literally everything about my role and wincon and proved that I have the Anti-Webadict wincon, so I don't know why I suddenly have suspicion on me or why I'm being accused of stealing hats.
Sorry, just had to poke you.
Switch to TolyK
...and then less than twenty minutes later, very next post, Fallacy drops the hammer. In short, you ask for our opinions, ask for our objections, get only the one, and roundly ignore it. Hell, Toony, who you said...
@Fallacy: We're NOT voting Toonyman today, just to be 100% clear. Focus elsewhere.
...said he didn't want a TolyK lynch, and yet from the first post I quoted here you don't even mention TolyK until you vote him. All I'm getting from you is bad faith arguments and reasonless opinions. I ask you to justify the vote again (because you sure never did before) and you ignore me. Sure, Fallacy is obvscum now, but you're dropping hard in my view.
PPE:
For whatever it's worth, I was running through the names hoping to get info. I had sorta forgotten that FOU could use that to hammer rather than discuss. Max was next.
Kinda interesting how FOU probably knew that as well.
I'm finding this hard to buy.