Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[FallacyofUrist]

I know you didn't claim. You have no reason to make yourself look like a Pro-Webadict if you're really Anti-Webadict, though.

Yeah, probably. I'm also Pro-Webadict. Nya.

You know what, you have a point nya. Let me amend my statement.

At the time you made your implied claim, Toony, you had no reason to make yourself look like a Pro-Webadict. After you made yours I had the reason of attempting to bait you.

Furthermore,

@FoU:
My first post was written in a way that looked like I was Pro-Webadict, yes, but I made no claim that I was! Giving Knightwing advice is not a claim! Saying that I'm going to assume that Pro-Webadict is town not a claim! I claimed no alignment! It only made me look like an alignment!

This was a calculated strategy, yes, but I did not lie or make hard claims.

What was that calculated strategy intended to do nya? Why did it even extend to saying 'Is Jim outed mafia then'?

[webadict]

Okay, is the constant "nya" thing part of your role or what? I just kinda assumed you were doing that for the fun of it.

@Helia:

"Incorrect. I just tried to shoot you for lying. FallacyofUrist."

Elaborate?

@Helia:  What did Fallacy lie about?

"Naturally, Player FallacyofUrist is attempting to use false information about what Player ToonyMan has claimed. Player ToonyMan could not have used an Action because I was targeted by an Action used by ToonyMan. You could say that a little birdy told me. So, I am, naturally, indebted to him, and thus I shot you. It is unlikely that anyone that is Pro-Webadict would target someone that used a revive on a Figment that aligns with the Webadict, and therefore, I can say that Player FallacyofUrist is not Pro-Webadict, and thus aligns against my own goals."

[Toaster]

@Helia: Wait, you shot Fallacy for lying about Toony shooting you?  That's a bit out of whack temporally.

Also, what are your goals now?

[FallacyofUrist]

...

...

So in other words

ToonyMan revived a Pro-Webadict aligned Figment nya?

Maybe he didn't shoot me personally, I can believe that, but this only makes him look more suspicious.

[ToonyMan]

Webadict has confirmed that my Mason chat is in fact alignment clearing as long as we're both alive. So if the other player would like to confirm we're both Anti-Webadict that would be great. I don't want to call them out on my own.

It does means that we might have revival conversions in this game though...not sure if my revival is safe.

"Naturally, Player FallacyofUrist is attempting to use false information about what Player ToonyMan has claimed. Player ToonyMan could not have used an Action because I was targeted by an Action used by ToonyMan. You could say that a little birdy told me. So, I am, naturally, indebted to him, and thus I shot you. It is unlikely that anyone that is Pro-Webadict would target someone that used a revive on a Figment that aligns with the Webadict, and therefore, I can say that Player FallacyofUrist is not Pro-Webadict, and thus aligns against my own goals."

*sweat drops*

PPE:

...

...

So in other words

ToonyMan revived a Pro-Webadict aligned Figment nya?

Maybe he didn't shoot me personally, I can believe that, but this only makes him look more suspicious.

I might have fucked up.

[webadict]

@Helia: Wait, you shot Fallacy for lying about Toony shooting you?  That's a bit out of whack temporally.

"You misunderstand, Player Toaster. I shot Player FallacyofUrist because they were going after Player ToonyMan. They then tried to play that off as Player ToonyMan shooting them, which is a lie because I shot them. Player ToonyMan has claimed one of Pro-Webadict and Anti-Webadict, but Player FallacyofUrist has only claimed Pro-Webadict, which cannot be true because I have been revived by Player ToonyMan. And we must, as they say, launch the liars."

[Toaster]

...

@Helia, @Aeos, @Erebos, and @Selene:  Are you Pro-Webadict, Anti-Webadict, Anti-Anti-Webadict, or other?  If other, can you elaborate?

[Egan_BW]

@Helia: You claim pro-Webaddict?

[FallacyofUrist]

If it was not already clear, I am Anti-Webadict aligned nya.

Just to be explicit about it. Didn't think it was needed, thought I already had, but y'know, here ya go.

I might have fucked up.

Slow clap. Beautiful job nya.

[ToonyMan]

Helia seems to be under the impression only a Pro-Webadict player would res them, little do they know how little I was paying attention during the setup phase. I figured it would be helpful to learn more about the setup since missing one of the Figments would mean missing a quarter of the NPC pool...but I think I should have waited knowing what I see now.

[ToonyMan]

@Helia:
What's up with your arm?

[Jim Groovester]

PPE:

...

...

So in other words

ToonyMan revived a Pro-Webadict aligned Figment nya?

Maybe he didn't shoot me personally, I can believe that, but this only makes him look more suspicious.

I might have fucked up.

It's okay. Some days you revive a figment that's opposed to your win condition, other days you unintentionally summon a meteor. It's all part of the fun.

Still very much looking to hear about everybody's patron figments.

[webadict]

...

@Helia, @Aeos, @Erebos, and @Selene:  Are you Pro-Webadict, Anti-Webadict, Anti-Anti-Webadict, or other?  If other, can you elaborate?

@Helia: You claim pro-Webaddict?

"I am Pro-Webadict."

Erebos backs away, left hand raised in guard. "Listen, I'm not involved in this. Y'all can figure this one out on your own. Sunflower is your problem now." The other two Figments look between the arguing parties and also decide this is not their fight.

Erebos has committed a Violation.

@Helia:
What's up with your arm?

"Rude."

[Egan_BW]

Well, there you have it, folks. Helia.

[TricMagic]

Helia Also who stole my Sprint Hat. Sure you get two night actions, but at what cost?