you just stole a dragons literal baby while it was distracted. PICK A SIDE.
I voted for the choice of sneaking past the dragon, without foreknowledge of the outcome. As it turned out, that involved stealing the eggs. That's not my fault, and frankly, it's probably better than straight-up killing the dragon, which I believe
you were voting for.
I
also disdain hypocrites, but I quite certainly have not been one in this game. What I
have done is try to pick options that weren't morally objectionable based on what we were told of them - something you've gone against on most occasions.
EDIT:
Magic has no specific alignment.
Well yeah, that's why vivomancy can come in each moral alignment. But actions definitely have alignments, and some types of magic lend themselves more toward one than another (there's not that many good applications of Negation, for example, though as we saw with the specter, there are some). Turning people into turtles is going to be almost always evil vivomancy, at least if done capriciously (and frankly, with the glee you refer to using it for that purpose on a bunch of people, it definitely sounds like you want to use it capriciously), while healing people is going to almost always be good vivomancy, and using it to manipulate objects is generally neutral and depends on the purpose.
EDIT2:
Put simply, while turning people into tortoises may require good vivomancy, wanting to become good at vivomancy does
not imply wanting to turn people into tortoises, and it is not hypocrisy to want to become good at vivomancy but not want to use it for the purpose of unwillingly polymorphing other people.