Is it to scrap the whole thing or is it to re-write portions of it? The opposition party wants to scrap the whole thing. That would cost the revenue required to pay off an IMF loan and cause greater reliance on taking further such loans in the future.
It does look like it has serious flaws. If it weren't for seeing similar movements turned against their own interest very recently by the machinations of extremely clever and resourced people with no scruples to match their authority, I would not be suspicious. If this is scrapped entiirely, and austerity goes in, who gets the blame?
The browser issue was from using Noscript, an extremely common addon for firefox. With the lack of consumer friendly regulation in my country due to the centrist Democrats having no-contact fumbled in favor of greater social controls and empowering the
New Nobility, the addon breaking a website was not unusual or even unintended. What was unusual was the behavior of the blocked script website in what clearly was a malfunction and a potentially irritating if not harmful one at that.
Yes, as to the last poiint that does not reassure towards either side.
The point of using reform instead of revolution is because reform within the system is generally less likely to receive a violent response than revolution, which is usually linked to violent action in the mind of the public even when that is not the intent. Even if we fooolishly loook past the moral question, and furthermore the costs, it still remains that revolution in light of largely (and outside of an outbreak mass violence, correctly) voluntarily disarmed civilian supporters is not a recipe for success; one of these combinations would have to change and I don't advocate for it at current times. As to why that distinction is important: in my opinion if people like me had called for marihuana revolutiion instead of reform through the ballot it probably wouldn't have worked.
On another hand, here is an interesting link:
http://www.parliament.go.ke/kenya-and-us-forge-stronger-legislative-tiesThat's the US House of Representatives. I'm wondering if that's partisan. Having US conservative politicians on one side would go a long way to reassure me that the other way is more than likely correct, judging from the past 20-30 years of selfish yet disasterous political choices during the 20 years of, by extension, watching and losing expensively while anything but pretending it isn't happening is cause for ostracization until a final collapse happens and no one loses their job.
However I want you to know the reason I don't jump immediately on things like this anymore is that I believe that people who consider themselves quite the opposite of friends to factions closer to fitting my view than the conservative clusterfuck pillage-off knows this and expect to take advantage of this by steering anyone they can in a bad direction using influential individuals and, where it exisits, leadership of movements directed towards a negative outcome. It's also an ironic way to nudge the conservatives to cut deals to politically speaking sell their soul when they are blinded by lust to hurt their domestic opposition, so it's perfect in the way of making these "strengths" into hypocrisy.
Author
Topic: Africa thread (Read 7165 times)