RVS sucks and RVS voters are dillweeds.
To be honest, I've played enough D1s to almost agree with you, but it's much better than the non-starter of sitting on our hands waiting for something (often bad) to happen. It's illuminating to watch who bandwagons who anyway.
Random votes and theoretical questions aren't required to start a discussion.
I don't see anybody giving 4maskwolf flak for brazen early Day 1 ploys.
And, really, RVS just is not fun. Don't you guys want to have
fun mafia games? Isn't that a more worthwhile goal than winning or losing?
PFP
You guys are dumb
ur dum!
Jim G:
RVS sucks and RVS voters are dillweeds.
ur a dillweed
You take that back!
@Jim:
I also don't want to see vote changes in the last 15 minutes, this should be alleviated somewhat by having hammers.
Hmm, BYOR15 had hammers but that didn't stop the wild ride that was the end of Day 1.
I guess we'll see what
certain people get up to.
ToonyMan, do you think you could tell scum!Jim, 3rdparty!Jim and town!Jim apart by now?
Do you?
I think people's reads on my meta are currently poorly tuned.
4mask, In recent games, Jim was grumpy as scum and he was cautious as third party. It's too early to say which is which but I'm happy to lay down a vote until we see something that definitely isn't "Jim complains about walls of texts and doesnt engage and then turns out to be scum".
--
Reverie, I took a moment to check and you may find these town games illuminating:
1
2
3
This is a very silly post. You attack me for my meta within the past six months while you defend yourself with your meta from
five seven years ago. In the same post.
if we're going by all time historical meta, I am both
historically and
legendarily grumpy regardless of alignment.
Pfp.
Jim/4mask
Unpack "fluffy", I don't get exactly what the accusation is. Do you mean, fluffy as in without substance, or fluffy as in soft? Am I cotton candy or cotton wool?
4mask, I figured, but you know, after recent shenanigans it's good to double check! But in seriousness I take it you don't have a wild claim but actually don't think this means anything, as you'd be suicidal to genuinely claim 3rd party so soon after that last ploy. I think you might have something on Jim, let's see now.
Bolded part is what bothers me most. If you removed the bolded part the point you were making would be entirely preserved, less the cheery explanation and half apology for why you're asking 4maskwolf questions.
It's... fluff. Both in being without substance and in being soft.
FoU's posts don't read right to me so far.
May I ask why that is? Develop your ideas a bit?
Hmm, after Caz mentioned it, your posts do remind me a bit of BYOR15, but I don't have a good sense of what your town meta looks like.
This post below:
"routine"
To be fair, it was how you acted the last time you were mafia, buuuut it's fair to say there are legitimate reasons to dislike the RVS phase, so I'll give you the benefit of the doubt for now.
Reminds me of BYOR15 FoU, with my recollection of that game being that you made a show of being rational and level-headed.
Everyone: Am I force to answer those...RVS questions?
So right, I don't know this set up very well. Nor do I have a good feel on who might be the scum. So I'm just gonna vote Jim Groovster for having that same attitude from last game.
also
fuck you for throwing me under the bus, Jim.
You didn't deserve it but that doesn't mean I feel particularly bad about doing it though.