Not much time today so just skimmed the thread.
NQTwuba
Vector[...]Other than that, I would say to be cautious of Caz. They're active, but they don't make compelling cases on who they believe to be Town or scum.
Do you think a Vector lynch is achievable today? We've got less that 24 hours, and you're lynch-lead. If you want people to switch to her, you're going to have to make a better case than your gut. I'll take a dive back on Caz
Much buddy, wow. Why so worried about webadict getting lynched?
LuckyOwl: Wtf means 'basically' town. Why say this??
Shifts vote to Vector for reasons.
Want to share with the rest of the group?
Caz
Not sure if I am allowed to scumhunt. Lynching Caz would be better than lynching Webadict.
Lol. This dude doesn't even have a pro-town alignment, if anything them voting me is evidence of why you shouldn't.
Caz Analysis
I counted 33* posts from Caz. Looking through them, I asked myself, "Does Caz actually want to find scum?" I took a broad view approach to this by characterising the posts into the following three categories. When I was in doubt, I tried to err on the generous side.
Low effort, uninformative (commentary, jokes) [4],[5],[6],[7],[9],[11],[21],[27],[28][29],[31] = 11 posts, 33.3%
Low-medium effort, informative (replies, low-ball questions) [2],[3],[8],[10],[12],[15],[16],[17],[19],[22],[24],[25],[26],[30] = 14 posts, 42.4%
High effort, informative/accusatory (i.e. more than 3 sentences, actual questions or accusation) [1],[13],[14],[18],[20],[23],[32],[33] = 24.2%
So, one third of Caz's content is straight up chaff, and three quarters of it is low effort. Slightly less than a quarter of their game is spent doing anything that looks like developing cases or finding scum.
Is this telling? I'd need to run the same analysis on some other players to get a sense, but I would support a Caz lynch. They don't spend a lot of time actually being town.
*It's possible I missed one or two, this would have been easier with the lurkertracker.
**PPE: some interesting non-Caz revelations I will respond to shortly
That is a lot of nonsense numbers. Is that seriously how you play the game now? Add the number of posts with jokes and use it as a conclusion? Or are we not allowed to joke because it will appear scummy? But we are allowed to insult? How many townie points do you get for making posts full of insults to players instead?
I'm eager to see your numbers for literally every other player, since it's impossible to make a comparison if you only produce 'data' on one person.
So this is how the votes currently stand and I don't like the feel of it.
Luckyowl (1):
webadict (4): notquitethere, SHAD0Wdump, Caz, hector13
Toaster (1): ToonyMan,
juicebox (1): Vector
Secretdorf (1): Toaster
notquitethere (0):
Vector (1) : TricMagic
Caz (2): juicebox, Secretdorf
ToonyMan (0):
hector13 (0):
SHAD0Wdump (0):
No Lynch (0):
Not voting (2): LuckyOwl, webadict
7 to hammer.
There's a majority on webadict and the rest just kind of smeared out across the board. Easy lynch = town lynch.
Man you are so worried about webadict when he has just half the votes on him needed for a lynch and he's been acting consistently scummy through the game. Maybe try to be less obsessed about numbers and do some actual scumhunting, it would be more helpful.
juiceboxHave any of your reads changed since you posted your readslist? Are you still leaning scum on Hector?
Yeah, my scumlist goes
webadict, Vector, LuckyOwl.
Wouldn't that be fun?
hector has been alright after the early game, I got no real feelings for them either way.
TricAt least it isn't as bad as BYOR was recently. Also, that type of explosion I see and just ignore as best I can. It doesn't really do anything productive for others.
It's a lot of crap. It puts people off playing the game, and is just a cheap emotional tactic (read: scummy as all hell). I have no idea why people in this game think that it's okay. Couple that with the laziness of wanting to policy lynch LuckyOwl (I almost typed IronyOwl here, sheesh. Whatever happened to them?) and the whole thing about wanting to wait for Vector (excuse to do nothing, then an excuse to have a pointless argument when they arrived), oof, why are you NOT voting webadict?
Yes, yes, he's a 'fruit vendor'. You ever hear of the fucking witch in storybooks giving out poisoned apples? No?
Also re: the amount of people who still want to consider my posts as lazy, passive etc I'm just going to re-remind you that my pressure on SD already got us a confirmed non-town player, while you have done... what? So vote yourselves first for laziness, thanks. (This is a joke. Do not actually vote for yourself.)
ToonyManYeah I agree with this. It also really bothers me that Caz thought Web and Vector "might be masons"?
This comment really comes off odd to me, Caz?
What bothers you about it? Is it the totally spooky way that everyone started claiming masons afterwards?
Hector13So far we have 2 claimed masons, Luckyowl and Toony, a non-SK and night only? And Shadow with Toaster.
Secretdorf has claimed survivor, Tric has claimed Miller.
Assuming everyone is being honest, and a 3-player scum team, that leaves potential scum between webadict, vector, juicebox, NQT, Caz, and me, with a side of Luckyowl and Toony.
WHY would you?!
I find it highly unlikely that there's 4 town masons, though. It's perfectly possible for them to be of different alignment.
VectorI think it is unlikely that NQT and Caz are on the same scumteam; if Wubba is scum, then NQT is probably on the same team as Web.
I'm town and I strongly urge anyone out there who can inspect me to do so. I can confirm someone and am going for one of {NQT, Caz, and Webadict}. I'm claiming in hopes that scum don't have multiple blockers, so that one of me and Secretdorf goes through.
Cool, confirm me, but please not with a bullet -.-
We can confirm webadict too, but earlier.