Because it's an easy vote you can do while blending into the shadows and not having to pick up the slack left to you. You can just borrow arguments from other people and pretend their yours. Nothing that I've seen from you is uniquely yours. You're just a bandwagoner. Also, you're voting TricMagic, and that's just dumb. TricMagic is basically Town, unless you want to claim they fakeclaimed as Miller, which is just... It's just not likely to happen.
Alright. I've got homework for you. Point out my votes where I join a bandwagon, find three and you get a cookie.
You've voted a total of four times, unless you want to be pedantic and call your double TricMagic votes as separate, but I don't because you voted the same in-between each one.
Your first vote was for Vector, an RVS vote. There was a useless question attached:
Vector, why were you the first to react when I asked to join?
And no, I will not be hopping on a memewagon against Luckyowl right off the bat. Don't want to run the risk of him actually getting hammered.(As funny as that would be.)
Useless drivel. You were concerned about "hammering Luckyowl," but it sounds an awful lot like you care a lot more about your image. Considering that the question itself doesn't appear to have any real backing behind it, we can safely remove this from the pool of candidates for "three votes".
Thus, we must prove that all three of your only votes were bandwagoning, which sort of makes you look like you're useless to the game because you're wasting time and posting space on being really bad at the game. And even if I get my cookie, you'll say, "Who cares?" and continue on with your charade.
But, that's the funny part, see:
I'm holding my vote on Vector to ensure they have pressure when they get back to respond, then I'll move my vote to pressure others.
My point about your lack of attacks was not to attack anybody in specific such as those with a certain playstyle, I wanted to see you back up your support for focusing elsewhere by... you know. Focusing elsewhere.
So why aren't you doing that?
I'm holding my vote on Vector to ensure they have pressure when they get back to respond, then I'll move my vote to pressure others.
My point about your lack of attacks was not to attack anybody in specific such as those with a certain playstyle, I wanted to see you back up your support for focusing elsewhere by... you know. Focusing elsewhere.
So why aren't you doing that?
You're holding your vote on fucking Vector for a fucking RVS question, instead of the two people you were actually suspicious of: hector13 for fucking
something about being an important role that shouldn't be killed (which hints that you're drinking the wine, or you're NOT drinking the wine and you actually fear hector13's role) and ToonyMan for rolefishing while you rolefished hector13 to explain both what their role is (You attempted to look up what a
Clown was, which means you definitely believed it was a possibility, and then demanded I explained what it was afterward when you were unable to find it.)
Easy and bad targets.
Eventually you unvoted me after being goaded into it because you realized your garbage vote on Vector for an RVS question that ultimately has no bearing on the game, and you probably will get flak for it.
I'm holding my vote on Vector to ensure they have pressure when they get back to respond, then I'll move my vote to pressure others.
My point about your lack of attacks was not to attack anybody in specific such as those with a certain playstyle, I wanted to see you back up your support for focusing elsewhere by... you know. Focusing elsewhere.
So why aren't you doing that?
Because I'm voting Luckyowl. Has something happened with Luckyowl that makes you think they are unworthy of being voted? Please, enlighten me.
You can pressure people without using your vote and you should damn well know that.
At this point, I'm a little triggered so fine. Webadict.
You'll also note that you kept your vote on Vector to pressure them, which is why you couldn't unvote, and then you unvoted them to vote me, supposedly because you realized that that statement is stupidly hypocritical.
I'm holding my vote on Vector to ensure they have pressure when they get back to respond, then I'll move my vote to pressure others.
My point about your lack of attacks was not to attack anybody in specific such as those with a certain playstyle, I wanted to see you back up your support for focusing elsewhere by... you know. Focusing elsewhere.
So why aren't you doing that?
These are literally two conflicting statements. You can pretend like they're not, but they are. You literally acknowledge that a vote has more pressure behind it, but you also refuse to move your vote to pressure the players you are actually suspicious of over the one you
RVSed. Like, explain that one to me, Einstein, I might learn more about Relativism. Is there pressure needed to answer that RVS question?
Tricmagic My vote's already on you, but I need to stress that it's staying there because of this shit right here:
For townreads, I will tentatively put forth Shadowdump into the spotlight. Still got a ways to go for the rest of them, but it's a good start. Back to breakfast.
Add Secretdorf to my list of suspicious suspects. What wagon did I join again? Given I think it was never a wagon in the first place, RVSes Luckyowl to pressure him is a fine plan. Then you go claiming I am the one fakeclaiming. Main point is I cannot be killed before at least one mafia dies, or a vig decides to shoot me. Mafia won't kill me because I can be lynched, town won't lynch me because I claimed Miller and cops won't investigate me. If I was SK it would be a very bold move to make. If I was mafia, it draw attention. If I'm town, it prevents wasting an investigate.
You can't waste a lynch, and can't believe me. So you turn to vigs to do the kill, wasting their kill on town if you are mafia. Very clear logic with absolutely no fault. (Other than the vry clear faults, see if you can spot it for me, would ya?)
Webadict is addicted to making webs. this isn't very new, it's how he catches his prey. The Null on NQT and Toaster is what pushes you into suspicion, on top of saying both Luckyowl and Shadow are towny. If it was just one it wouldn't be as erroneous to me, but you buddy two.
Woah, get back! No getting frisky with me!
First you buddy up to me quite aggressively, then you make a highly specific claim for being a highly resistant WIFOM mess of a role while throwing out a heaping load of WIFOM yourself, and then you top off this mess with a load of hypocrisy about buddying when you just humped my leg in the last post?
Get off it. I could see a person trying to stop the town from making a big mistake dealing with a role like that, but you had barely any pressure on you and you just spill all of this town-confusing mess everywhere. You need grilled HARD.
So why? What are you really trying to accomplish with this? Give me a damn good reason to unvote you.
SHAD0Wdump - Biased - Neutral: I don't like their cases, but I can't trust myself to make an unbiased assessment of them. So, we'll stick them here.
*taunt* What? Did I not stroke your ego enough? Or are you just afraid I might actually be mafia and you don't want to kill your allies? *taunt*
Also, asking a vig to soot me to confirm in that manner of phrasing is not very town. What in the world would you get out of confirming me a miller other than dead town? Is my play to reveal that info so confusing to one who seeks survival that you can't comprehend it?
Are you invulnerable or not? Or are you a filthy miller-claiming liar?
To all players: Who are you willing to lynch besides me?
Tricmagic, obviously. Webadict next. Probably hector after that.
After that, you voted TricMagic, presumably because you can't come up with a way to make someone look guilty but only does so through game mechanics. No, wait, you also voted them for calling you Town, which, indeed, might be a lynchable offense, since you're clearly doing nothing to show that. Instead, you're acting like people calling people Town is somehow a scummy defense, which explains
your suspicions so far are on people that have defended other people. You have been using some sort of weird tying system to create covert teams in plain sight, which is a neat way to get out of being suspected since you won't have to deal with the flak when your suspect is lynched by saying it was the
other person that was suspicious instead.
So, maybe you're right in that you're not a true bandwagoner, but your votes have been, at best, purely game mechanics related, and at worst,, purely on those that defended another player, and any real evidence has been provided by someone else. Also, if you didn't really think you were a bandwagoner, you would've said find one instance, especially since you only voted 4 times. Guess you don't truly believe in your ability to defend your past votes or deal with suspicion, do you?
Author
Topic: Mostly Vanilla Mafia 2 / Game Over - Agent Eats Hot Dogs While Writing Report (Read 41751 times)