LuckyOwlEveryone: Why do you think they kill 4maskwolf?
Because 4mask claimed that he and ICT had the lovers drawback which kills ICT on 4mask's death. Pretty clear case of someone wanting to get two kills out of one shot.
Toaster how does your inspect make sense now 4mask has flipped? What do you say to 4mask's insistence that you showed TMI?
Heydude, this isn't actually too alignment-relevant but I'd like to give you a tip as you seem annoyed about my analysis. Genuine outrage at being mischaracterised is a good town indicator. But you should also be wary of suspecting people just based on the fact they are open to suspecting you: town spend most of their time chasing false leads and are bound to suspect each other.
Everyone, I don't know why Toaster made that play but here are my current best guesses:
- Scum!Toaster hoped to break the mason claim headon with a false inspect, kill both of them with a lynch, and then take the fall the next day, getting rid of x3 townies (4mask, ICT, plus a night kill) for the price of one Toaster. This seems like a weak and unnecessary play when they could just lynch some other town and NK ICT but it's possible there's some additional considerations I'm not seeing.
- Toaster is just a jester
- Toaster's ability went awry and they're all town
- ICT genuinely is scum and their masonhood with 4mask was some kind alignment-deceiving power (this seems least likely).
My suggestion is to try to puzzle out the night actions through claims first.
Additionally: a mafia day kill doesn't really gel with a scum!toaster. Why would mafia undermine their own ploy with a 4mask flip? So either most likely:
- Toaster is town and mafia killed 4mask
- Toaster is mafia and some town(!) or third party killed 4mask (why??)