It's a stressful time, but there's no need to get carried away with these sorts of divisive labels and rhetoric.
I can see where your coming from, but in the context of Brazil, someone calling for the return of AI-5 is equivalent to a German calling for the reinstatement of the SS and the gas chambers. Calling them a "Nazi" in that context would
not be inflammatory - it's just descriptive. In the Brazilian context, calling someone who promotes the return of AI-5 a fascist, is similarly merely descriptive.
See Hitler's
Enabling Act of 1933 for reference. Brazil's AI-5 act allowed basically the same things the Enabling Act did for Hitler. AI-5 was the law law allowing arbitrary arrest and torture of dissidents (effectively: anybody), and for the president to remove any elected official from office, and to overrule the congress, constitution and court system. This law was effectively the specific tool to turn the nation into a one-party fascist state (by removing all opposition candidates from office and blocking them from running again), so I make no bones about calling the advocates for this law fascists, because they are that by definition. It's the same law that is recognized as formally declaring the dictatorship in Nazi Germany in '33.
EDIT: maybe it was inflammatory of me to call them "fascist bootlickers" but I don't really think so. I called them that because what they're actually asking for (whether fully understood or not) is the reinstatement of the one-party police state, and their obvious assumption is that they'll be the loyal faithful so they won't be targeted. This is why they are
bootlickers.