I'm afraid I'm missing the point that you are making Trekkin
All I'm saying is that if the virus can speard as easily and is as deadly as the rumors claim then we are going to witness an unexpectedly big increase in the reported numbers from all over the world. And since these reports will come from different countries with probably different interests/priorities then it will be a lot more difficult if not impossible to contain/obscure the new numbers.
Right, and I'm not saying that's not a sensible approach to take, only that it's more complicated to do so than it might first appear. RNA viruses mutate millions of times more rapidly than their hosts, and they tend to trend more pathogenic over time, selective pressure being what it is. This has two main implications for trying to detect falsified numbers in its spread:
1. The virus that shows up in other countries may well not be Wuhan's 2019-nCov, genetically speaking, by the time it does, and we'd expect a priori that the more virulent strains are more likely to spread. If other countries do show that "Wuhan coronavirus" is worse than China is reporting, that could easily really be the case.
2. We're all talking about this virus like it's one homogenous population. It probably isn't, even now, so it's reasonable to expect different outcomes to correlate to genetic variation -- which might also account for misdiagnoses that become obvious in hindsight. If later estimates are higher, it may well be because we found a more complete set of rtPCR primers with which to reduce the false negative rate.
All I'm saying is that we should wait on extrapolating out the odds that China is fudging its numbers before we have a sense of the underlying phylogenetics of the outbreak.