Huh. That's... OK, actually. I hadn't really looked at Deus' case much; he was a complete null-read for me.
-----------------------
I don't have time right now to link this up to quotes properly, but the relevant material's all in D3. Not hard to find.
Leafsnail
Soon after Tric posts his "slip", you jump in to advocate a no-lynch and to draw attention away from Tric towards Nirur Torir. When Nirur Torir calls you out on it, you dismiss Tric's "slip" as a typographical error, offering up a shoddy reinterpretation of what was a pretty clear post at the time. You then continue to attack Nirur Torir.
RGU calls you out on your strange reinterpretation. You continue to insist that Tric's slip is most likely a typographical error, nothing more. We don't buy it, so you continue attempting to draw attention back to Nirur Torir. You then advocate a No Lynch again.
Nnnnope. We still don't buy it. So you declare Tric to be a "village idiot" whose posts are not to be taken seriously, and declare that if you were scum, you could've told TricMagic not to say the stuff he said. Hello WIFOM!
If you'd just been defending TricMagic on one count, I could pass it by. But you've been defending Tric on multiple counts, inventing new ways to pull attention off him whenever the last one fails. Why? Why were you so convinced lynching him was a bad idea? Why... unless he was scum, and you were scum, and you were trying to defend your scumbuddy? Explain!
(Incidentally, I'm inclined to believe you did try to coach Tric into playing better and failed, which is why you seemed so irritated with him towards the end of the Day. But I'll not build a case on being irritated with Tric.)