TricFor 1, having the SK around with the Mafia would theoretically mean two kills rather than 1. The second is how he was playing, what he said. I felt like he was SK, or as I have said, town with a Kill ability. He just felt that way to me. Might of helped if he didn't keep up that type of dialogue right up to the end.
You've said this already. I asked you why you decided to choose the person you thought was a serial killer as your lynch target while doing nothing to confirm your suspicions of or put focus on the people you said you thought were scum in your read list.
What I wonder is why IcyTea even made a theoretical case against themselves in the first place, only to answer their own questions. I don't see a reason to do something like that unless you are ready to tear into someone else with a lot of evidence. A preemptive case makes the info gained differ, and hector's case likely would be different.
So do you agree or disagree with IcyTea's claim from the start of Day 1 that hector was asking him to build a case on himself?
Nirur:I thought the example was self-evident by asking if it bothered you, and then using it: Being called scummy with little evidence annoys you, and, apparently, you alone.
Why is that, Scummy Asmoth? Are you scum?
I'm going to be honest here: I'm pretty sure that you're intentionally misinterpreting and misrepresenting what I'm saying at this stage, so this reply is more for anyone else who might be looking at this than it is for you. Regardless, let's get down to why your claims are incorrect.
Reads:
SuperDorf: Playing a townie D1, posting plenty and questioning people. Very fragile under pressure. The bandwagon thing could easily just be a newb-tell. Leaning town, and I'd prefer not to lynch the enthusiastic newbie D1.
hector13: Is tunneling IcyTea, but it doesn't feel superflous. Lightly scum-leaning D1 game.
Shakerag: Got drunk and posted lots of small posts, stirring up activity. Town-leaning D1 game.
KitRougard: His strange obsession with powers continues. Has asked a few questions, mostly about powers and roles. Scum-leaning D1 game, with some slack for newbishness.
randomgenericusername: Isn't active and interacting on his own, citing RL stuff, but is paying attention. Has asked 0 questions, scummy D1 game.
Leafsnail: Has barely posted, but has now attacked Hector for spending the day tunneling. Scummy D1 game.
IcyTea31: He's hard for me to read. He seems to be trying to find scum at least, but Hector's RVS-holdover tunnel has him bothered. Why? Scum lean.
Maximum Spin: An entirely reactive strategy feels scummy, as he's not trying to move the game along at all, and is letting everyone else direct the flow of information. Scum lean.
Deus Asmoth: Doing very little. Has asked a few weak questions. Scum lean.
TricMagic: Wants us to know that he doesn't care about what's going on, because video games. Scummy, unless he puts in serious effort to make up for it tomorrow.
Starver: Entirely absent.
This is the read list that I asked you about originally. It's important to note that you have me as a scum lean and not as a scummy D1 player, because that's a difference that's apparently important to you.
By my count, you've got a grand total of eight scumreads. Surely some of those people must be town?
I'm differentiating between "scummy" and "scummy D1 game."
The latter is based on the idea that town is better off with a D1 if everyone is involved. And so those who aren't adding much have a scummy D1.
Do you have a reason for this other than obfuscating who you actually think is scum?
Your response to this was that your read list apparently pressured the people you felt weren't contributing despite them having no reason to be threatened by you thinking more than half the players in the game were scum.
I read your post, which was the entire point of my question. Why did you decide to call the people you were pointing out scummy when you could have just called them out for lurking or whatever you actually think the problem with their play is, if you didn't actually intend people to think you thought they were scummy?
In which I clarify my problem with you talking about D1 summy and actual scummy players after you apparently didn't get it the first time.
Oh? Does it bother you when I call you scummy? Scummy Asmoth has a nice ring to it I admit.
As I pointed out earlier, I was not one of the people that your were claiming was D1 scummy. So either you're conflating the people you claimed were scummy and the people you claimed were "D1 scummy"- aka exactly what I was pointing out by asking you about it- or you're just responding aggressively for no reason other than you felt like it.
I don't especially care that you think I'm scummy, but the fact that your case so far appears to be based on little other than confirmation bias is worth noting.
It annoys you enough that you ignored my question, here it is again for easy reference:
randomgenericusername, KitRougard, and Deus Asmoth: D1's lynch came down to Hector or Spin, and you three weren't here to vote for either. I'd like for each of you to say who you'd have preferred to have your vote on, or no lynch, and why.
It's good to see you going after someone now, at least. Would you have tried to lynch Tric yesterday, if you were here?
If Tric had responded the same way as he did today then yes.
Kit:Hang on a minute, I have an attack on Hector.
We've clarified that (at least one) of his abilities is Kill Yourself, which is a Kill. That puts him in the running for being SK.
Someone mentioned "With SK that's 2 NK not just one..." Well wouldn't the SK want to get stab-happy? Unless, of course, their KILL ability is Kill Yourself...
Hector! Stand for your theoretical crimes!
If you can find the post where this was said I'd appreciate it, because I couldn't see hector confirming this anywhere. In fact he said earlier that he wasn't saying what his role was changed from or to. Otherwise, how is this a case on hector as opposed to anyone else?
Author
Topic: Proc Gen Mafia 2 -GAME OVER - TOWN VICTORY (Read 100774 times)