No. Military coups are not revolutions.
Remember kids:
If it's from within a government (military still counts as government): it's a coup.
If it's from without a government: it's a revolution.
The definition of revolution disagrees with you.
Remember kiddies if you don't understand definitions, no one will ever take you seriously.
rev·o·lu·tion
/ˌrevəˈlo͞oSH(ə)n/Submit
noun
1.
a forcible overthrow of a government or social order in favor of a new system.
synonyms: rebellion, revolt, insurrection, mutiny, uprising, riot, rioting, insurgence, seizure of power, coup (d'état)
"the French aristocracy was ill-prepared to quell a revolution"
2.
an instance of revolving.
"one revolution a second"
synonyms: turn, single turn, rotation, circle, spin; More
I am basing my definition on those of political scientists. Not on a random dictionary. But hey, thump that book if it makes you feel better.
Ah yes lets keep changing definitions of words going forward into the future.
Such as "Racism" Which is now something only people in positions of power can do.
And
Revolution, which now has a new meaning too!
Cause keeping the same meaning of words for hundreds of years is stupid clearly, and we should constantly be changing definitions in order to avoid hurting feelings and to further push a globalism agenda.
The Soviet Russians (Communists) loved to change the definitions of words. It brings great power when you are able to decide what a word means especially when it has had the same meaning for hundreds of years.
Ah and you gotta respond to "contest" the dictionary definition of a word to let the public know the truth!
Yep classic communist logic there.
Try opening a dictionary.