Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

Complete Reversal and removal

6 (30%)

Stopped, no more catification, but not less

2 (10%)

Reversal, but requires small magic input to keep

4 (20%)

Embrace the cat

8 (40%)

Total Members Voted: 20

[NUKE9.13]

You're counting these votes, right?

May I suggest the 2d4 system?

I will recommend [the 2d4] system very highly.

2d4 system rocks

I will throw in my support for 2d4.

Yeah, 2d4 would be good, I think.

yeah I'm gonna agree with the others on the 2d4 system.

I like the 2d4 system, so backing that.

[Gwolfski]

You're counting these votes, right?

May I suggest the 2d4 system?

I will recommend [the 2d4] system very highly.

2d4 system rocks

I will throw in my support for 2d4.

Yeah, 2d4 would be good, I think.

yeah I'm gonna agree with the others on the 2d4 system.

I like the 2d4 system, so backing that.

yeah

[Tyrant Leviathan]

The dice system should stay and I do not agree with resources issues as it should be by land type. Like in original.

Just curious what everyone started stuff is. Given sequel could have many directions.

[NAV]

Eh, maybe have transports factored in for troop/artillery/whatever mobility but not for transporting raw resources.

[Zanzetkuken The Great]

My thoughts on the way you could use infrastructure: Treat it like naval advantage in Intercontinental Arms Race. 

[Chiefwaffles]

While I still maintain that special infrastructure (i.e. stuff to do new things or that use new tech for significant improvements) should be a thing able to be done in regular designs, I do think I agree with the removal of TC.
It just... doesn't add anything. Every X turns, when you get enough resources, you revise your biggest [land/air/sea] vehicle into a cargo vehicle, then forget about it until you hit your TC limit again.

Troop transport, ammunition, and general battlefield logistics however, I think should have some impact. Even if it's abstracted (just GM saying "well Side A has a cool train and Side B has horses, so Side A gets an advantage here") it could work; but I think something like a smaller version of naval combat in ICAR where the GM describes the advantages and disadvantages of both sides' logistics in each theatre and how it impacts the fighting would be the best approach.
(Zan ninja'd me)

[evictedSaint]

While I still maintain that special infrastructure (i.e. stuff to do new things or that use new tech for significant improvements) should be a thing able to be done in regular designs, I do think I agree with the removal of TC.
It just... doesn't add anything. Every X turns, when you get enough resources, you revise your biggest [land/air/sea] vehicle into a cargo vehicle, then forget about it until you hit your TC limit again.

Troop transport, ammunition, and general battlefield logistics however, I think should have some impact. Even if it's abstracted (just GM saying "well Side A has a cool train and Side B has horses, so Side A gets an advantage here") it could work; but I think something like a smaller version of naval combat in ICAR where the GM describes the advantages and disadvantages of both sides' logistics in each theatre and how it impacts the fighting would be the best approach.
(Zan ninja'd me)

I agree with waffles

[Gwolfski]

Poll on the issue of catification is up. See OP for details before voting!!

[Chiefwaffles]

Please don't do catification.
I would like to be able to play.

[helmacon]

Please don't do catification.
I would like to be able to play.

+1

Also, it makes zero sense thematically and mechanically

[FallacyofUrist]

It's up to you whether you play or not. A gameplay element doesn't remove your ability to play.

Sadly, this is a... controversial issue. I'm surprised so many people are going for it. I know I'll play no matter how it turns out, even if my character's life's work is completely nullified.

Also, it makes zero sense thematically and mechanically

Presumably, it's cat hybrids rather than a complete transformation. I'm sure Gwolf has something planned.

[Maximum Spin]

Sadly, this is a... controversial issue. I'm surprised so many people are going for it. I know I'll play no matter how it turns out, even if my character's life's work is completely nullified.

I imagine many people are driveby-voting for fun with no intention to play.

[Chiefwaffles]

Yeah. I'm not a huge fan of the voting being done this way. I think it'd be better done after the team threads are made, with the voting done by post to prevent non-participators from voting.

[Happerry]

Yeah. I'm not a huge fan of the voting being done this way. I think it'd be better done after the team threads are made, with the voting done by post to prevent non-participators from voting.

+∞

[piratejoe]

I may be biased, okay I am but thats besides the point, but I think nullifying Urists work is kind of cruel. Just let there be catgirls and catguys