I need to unpack your explanation a little, Max, as it seems to me that Gifting has been heavily at play, on top of any Gifting, given all confirmed people have two available Actions and I don't yet know enough to be even half sure of anything, though I am just about half sure of something else, rounded down, for all the good it does me.
(PPE: Double ninja by Tir, doesn't seem to affect anything of the above, though.)
Wha-choo talkin' about bro'? @_@
A Swap action should (by the logic I ascribe to the basic words, though I welcome corrections on that) leave Player A with Action B and Player B with Action A (or a more convoluted variation, but ultimately conserving the total actions at one per Player).
All the information I have shows that someone(s), Player W
1..n has(/have) been Gift actioning, for the reveal to be Player A having Action X + Action C, Player B having Action Y + Action D (noting that X and Y might be A and B, or indefinable due to unknown Swaps also having happened to original A and/or B from Player(s) Z
1..m.
Which is gonna need work to disentangle. I'm also hoping that something I've already said sparks somebody to realise something else. At least one other person. Then perhaps we know more about how the swapsies/gifties progressed. Not that in itself this exonerates
or condemns anyone (granted actions are neutral to alignment, at that level), but it may still be useful to see how this keeps the actors honest(/unable to hide their nefariousness) once it starts rolling out. To that end, I can see myself corroborating someone (especially if it's who I think it is) and opening up myself by doing so.
(And I mentioned why I didn't tie-break, at the end of D1. Not enough reason to personally doom either candidate. We got two reveals
anyway, which is the only reason why people want D1 lynches in advance of the often inevitable N1 kill, and it was already two Townies and thus ended up bad. It might have improved things if we'd
also randomlynched a Scum, but the odds of that were too high for my liking, vs the likelihood of losing a third Town. My justification, by my evaluation, and I know not everyone would agree with the reasoning but that's how I swing. And unless I'm Scum trying to protect both my Scumbrothers (or small-'f' frame them as such?) by refusing to sling either under the bus, I submit that this is the more Town-friendly attitude. YMMV.)