Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Roboson]

Lu has the potential to be friends with anyone. He's a fairly moral neutral kind of god. Plus, especially with the various improvement and evolutionary gods, he can agree with them on most things. Improvement is stronger, so thats good. Smarter is stronger, so that's good. So on and so forth.

[NUKE9.13]

Lu has the potential to be friends with anyone. He's a fairly moral neutral kind of god. Plus, especially with the various improvement and evolutionary gods, he can agree with them on most things. Improvement is stronger, so thats good. Smarter is stronger, so that's good. So on and so forth.

I think Glass is suggesting an alliance of gods who are 'Good'. You can't get into their clubhouse if you're Neutral.

[Glass]

It was more about being advocates of sentients making ordered societies.

[Roboson]

This is how I see the moral division so far. Obviously it's not entirely accurate and may change as the game goes on. I tried to view it from mortal eyes, so I guess this is a list of how I think mortals will view the gods.

Astarth - Neutral leaning Good
Acter - Good
Exkit - Neutral
Gnyr - Good leaning Neutral
Lu - Neutral leaning Evil
X'ariliyg, Hope's End - Evil
Oba - Good
Mithra - Good

[codybob1999]

This is how I see the moral division so far. Obviously it's not entirely accurate and may change as the game goes on. I tried to view it from mortal eyes, so I guess this is a list of how I think mortals will view the gods.

Astarth - Neutral leaning Good
Acter - Good
Exkit - Neutral
Gnyr - Good leaning Neutral
Lu - Neutral leaning Evil
X'ariliyg, Hope's End - Evil
Oba - Good
Mithra - Good

I quite agree with your assessment of my characters morality

[crazyabe]

Spoiler (click to show/hide)

Name: Hixiux
Sphere: Chaos
Description: Twisting, Burning, ever changing Hixius twists in chaos burning all in his path

[Glass]

Spoiler (click to show/hide)

Name: Hixiux
Sphere: Chaos
Description: Twisting, Burning, ever changing Hixius twists in chaos burning all in his path

I believe we have thoroughly set a lawful good-chaotic evil divide now.

[Jerick]

Spoiler (click to show/hide)

Name: Hixiux
Sphere: Chaos
Description: Twisting, Burning, ever changing Hixius twists in chaos burning all in his path

You'll get in next turn (8 gods are already enough to turn this little fledgling world into a cinder)
Speaking off the thread is up

[NUKE9.13]

Question: what would it take to create a new area? An Act? Two Acts? A Great Act?

[Roboson]

And so it begins. Now that I've posted I'm not sure about the legitimacy though. So like I wanted to treat them as 1 artifact with 3 separate vessels. Is that legitimate? For power calculations each boomerang itself could possibly be divided by 3 since its really 1 artifact. Not that I think it will matter much, since they're literally just magically heavy objects. The passive is "Be really heavy" and the active is "Fly as though you aren't incredibly heavy" lol.

[NUKE9.13]

Also, I notice a volcanic eruption is a calamity. Does that preclude me from making a volcano with an Act?

[Jerick]

Question: what would it take to create a new area? An Act? Two Acts? A Great Act?

All you need to make a new area is to create some form of separation between the new area and the old one. Even if it's just doing something to make one area a little more distinct. So it's just an act. If and when nations start forming there should be plenty of areas.

As to your other question acts are a little weaker in this than some other games. You could make a volcanic eruption yourself but it would be smaller, more localized and pale in comparison to what would happen if the volcanic eruption calamity gets drawn.

And so it begins. Now that I've posted I'm not sure about the legitimacy though. So like I wanted to treat them as 1 artifact with 3 separate vessels. Is that legitimate? For power calculations each boomerang itself could possibly be divided by 3 since its really 1 artifact. Not that I think it will matter much, since they're literally just magically heavy objects. The passive is "Be really heavy" and the active is "Fly as though you aren't incredibly heavy" lol.

I have gone back and edited a line in the rules that really was meant to be there from the beginning. But the gist of it is that when you make an artifact you describe it and I try and interpret that into rules. You're right that dividing it into 3 is fine, one artifact can only be wielded by one person and so long as that remains true you can split your artifacts into as many parts as you wish. Now looking at your artifact the rules I'd give are "passive +2 on combat and hunting contests and the active is Hunting Tools; lose this artifact to stop the famine calamity from taking effect"

[NUKE9.13]

Just so we're all clear: we're already up to two acts in the plains. One more, and we trigger a random Lesser Calamity. Which wouldn't be great, at this early stage.

[Jilladilla]

Is this still open for more or is this a case of where there is already more than enough people?

[Criptfeind]

Just so we're all clear: we're already up to two acts in the plains. One more, and we trigger a random Lesser Calamity. Which wouldn't be great, at this early stage.

BOOM THERE WE GO

On a more serious note, there's no way to avoid such a thing, unless we agree for some gods to not act. 8 gods and only two locations of any interest. I suggest everyone make an area at the start and we just eat a couple of turn one calamities.