#PFP
Tiruin: Hector claimed using his role reset thingy on D3.
Well, here was a part of a post I made two days ago that I thought was invalidated by the one mafiakill allowed per cycle thing in the OP:
FallacyOfUrist had the following: (1-Shot, Mafiakill) Server Ban [target]: Kill the target. If the target would resurrect, you steal that ability first.
4maskwolf had the following: (1-Shot, Mafiakill) The Monster Within [target]: Convert the target to your alignment. If this action succeeds, you die and give the player this role. You roleflip as the converted player’s role and alignment.
I suspect that the abduction kill, rather than stemming from a 3rd party, is actually an (X-Shot, Mafiakill) [target] that kills the target and delays their flip for one phase. Mafiakills having weird effects seeming to be a theme is my main reason for feeling that way.
If this is the case, then this very likely means that doll was redirected to kill Persus, and that one of the following things occurred N2:
-> (1) The Monster Within was used on hector, who had good interactions with flipped scum and had used a friendly neighbor abilities; he could fakeclaim that 4mask's initial monster role had a roleswapping thing (similar to Tiruin's initial role)
-> (2) Mafia!TBF's X-Shot was used
-> (3) For whatever reason, they just regularly mafia killed or something else I don't understand
If I'm incorrect, then (FMPOV) the 3P abduction killer is always either Hector (due to not being confirmed as doing anything else N1/N3) or Persus (only person who is confirmed as doing other things that I'm not convinced by their claim that they're unlikely to be able to do multiple actions in one phase). If I am correct and it's from the mafia, then it's either Persus or Jack
~
Having looked up the wikipedia article for the Prague Defenestrations, it's not intuitive to me why the first one would be associated with protect/block, so I'd like flavor explanations for that from Persus.
Flabort - I'm Calendar Man, as previously claimed. I do not currently have any usable abilities that can target other people. I will have to ask how my absentee vote, which I receive after dying once, would interact with your role (whether it just counts as me targeting the vote count, or would count as targeting you). I believe Persus also claimed his role name today.
Jack:The top tier of my reads list meant "if I knew for a fact that mafia was the only antitown faction remaining in this game, I would be content literally never lynching these people."
Next tier was like, I feel like I have good reasons to believe these two are not mafia (Persus would be hellbussing + assumption that he was killed by the mafia N1; DarkStar<->TBF interactions looked great), but also some reservations.
Your tier was like, I can see how the pushes you made D1-D3 are pro-scum. But I don't find your manner of play anywhere near as actively implausible coming from a town perspective as any flipped mafia. To say it another way, with the axioms I went into the day with, you best fit as a fourth scum, but I wasn't/am not totally confident that those axioms were the right ones.
I don't have access to the same information that TolyK and Tiruin do that makes them townread you. I wish they'd expand upon that rather than just being like, "it'd be funny/sad if he's scum cuz we're planning together!" "we made lots of posts so I think we're all town" etc.
I think I'm at, like, 65/33/2 on
Persus/ Jack / {others} being mafia ATM? I think Persus's claim is scummier, my gut thinks Persus is most likely to shoot DarkStar there, I think I mainly townread him but for dying N1 which I have my doubts about now, and I don't like his lazy stance on me today.
flabort- If I'm lynched, it doesn't reload until the end of the next day. So I can die forever from being lynched two days in a row, in addition to what you were saying. Blame Web if you don't like how it's worded!
Jack: It being 22 hours instead of 12 hours somewhat explains why you didn't extend even though Toly was p pro extension. I feel that it's odd that you weren't more focused on the extension bc you didn't post again until after [original DL] hit, but it's less slam dunk odd.
Wrt not emphasizing disagreements- the things I disagreed with you about I was either (1) already explaining/you were engaging with me about (that I was seeing non-TolyK-related alignment indicative stuff) or (2) perceiving as preliminary-ish impressions on your end that I was more interested in just seeing where they went? If I was avoiding conflict with you it was a subconscious thing.