Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Poll

Which team did you play in the last game?

Glorious Arstotzka
- 17 (16%)
Glorious Moskurg
- 13 (12.3%)
Ingloriously Didn't Play
- 76 (71.7%)

Total Members Voted: 106


Pages: 1 ... 129 130 [131] 132 133 ... 500

Author Topic: Intercontinental Arms Race: Finale  (Read 605872 times)

Taricus

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Intercontinental Arms Race: Spring 1939 (Design Phase)
« Reply #1950 on: May 17, 2017, 06:10:19 am »

I dunno if we kill them with something bearing the same name we'll put that little bit more superstition into them
Logged
Quote from: evictedSaint
We sided with the holocaust for a fucking +1 roll

Azzuro

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Intercontinental Arms Race: Spring 1939 (Design Phase)
« Reply #1951 on: May 17, 2017, 07:41:10 am »


What's with the Russian Communist pirates and the disappearance of our aircraft carrier? Comintern deciding to strike first?

Quote
UF-39-APC "Croc": (2) NUKE9.13, Azzuro

Voting for the Croc, although I do agree it really needs a different name from the Cannalan ace. Can't think of a good name, at the moment. I like the sound of a new tank, but please please don't squeeze in ERA into it, we don't want our efforts to turn around the ground war hinging on that bloody thing.
Logged

United Forenia Forever!

Taricus

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Intercontinental Arms Race: Spring 1939 (Design Phase)
« Reply #1952 on: May 17, 2017, 08:04:14 am »

Quote
UF-39-APC "Croc": (2) NUKE9.13, Azzuro
UF-40-H/MB-T 'Demolisher': (1) Taricus
Logged
Quote from: evictedSaint
We sided with the holocaust for a fucking +1 roll

NAV

  • Bay Watcher
  • I have an idea!
    • View Profile
Re: Intercontinental Arms Race: Spring 1939 (Design Phase)
« Reply #1953 on: May 17, 2017, 08:44:00 am »

War tigers = huge jungle advantage
Logged
Highmax…dead, flesh torn from him, though his skill with the sword was unmatched…military…Nearly destroyed .. Rhunorah... dead... Mastahcheese returns...dead. Gaul...alive, still locked in combat. NAV...Alive, drinking booze....
The face on the toaster does not look like one of mercy.

Kashyyk

  • Bay Watcher
  • One letter short of a wookie
    • View Profile
Re: Intercontinental Arms Race: Spring 1939 (Design Phase)
« Reply #1954 on: May 17, 2017, 09:11:13 am »

War tigers would be good anti infantry weapons. We need to fill the armour role however.

Alternative names for the Croc:
- Gator
- Duck
- Bullfrog

Do any of those sound appropriate?
Logged

Khan Boyzitbig

  • Bay Watcher
  • [THOUGHTS:CHAOTIC] [ACTUALLY A SWAN]
    • View Profile
Re: Intercontinental Arms Race: Spring 1939 (Design Phase)
« Reply #1955 on: May 17, 2017, 09:14:39 am »

You know how I kept suggesting we have a new heavy tank? Yeah, I think we need a new heavy tank. Going to modify my Vanguard a little though.
I'm going to suggest something random, a heavy tank.

UF-HAT-39-B "Vanguard"

A very heavily armoured tank with sloped armour mounting a 105mm cannon (or at least room for one) in a bulging turret with dual coaxial M3 sorraias and a hull mounted Incinerator flamethrower. The tracks are protected by steel plates along the flanks and the supercharged V12 engine is mounted aft with the fuel and the armour is slightly thicker there. The tank's purpose is to be the first into a fight and clear out entrenched infantry or lighter tanks while shrugging off anti-tank munitions. Speed is less important and the vehicle is likely to be about 35kph on good terrain. Additional design features include angled forward track sections which allow the vehicle to climb trenches or riverbanks and can swap the flamethrower for a machine gun and use the flame tanks as oxygen tanks while sealing down the hull to enable semi-aquatic travel for a limited time.

Estimated difficulty: Hard (maybe very hard)
Logged
////;::;\\\\ Scuttle Scuttle...

Milk for the Khorneflakes!

Luminous Bolt of Bacon
"Excuse me sir, You are on Fire."

evictedSaint

  • Bay Watcher
  • if (ANNOYED_W_FANS==true) { KILL_CHAR(rand()); }
    • View Profile
Re: Intercontinental Arms Race: Spring 1939 (Design Phase)
« Reply #1956 on: May 17, 2017, 09:58:23 am »

Quote
UF-39-APC "Croc": (3) NUKE9.13, Azzuro, evictedSaint
UF-40-H/MB-T 'Demolisher': (1) Taricus

Voting for the obvious neccesity. 

Let's name it something else, though.  Maybe...
The Piranha?

helmacon

  • Bay Watcher
  • Just a smol Angel
    • View Profile
Re: Intercontinental Arms Race: Spring 1939 (Design Phase)
« Reply #1957 on: May 17, 2017, 10:00:39 am »

It's amphibious so... The salamander? We could mount a flamethrower on it if that helps.  :P
Logged
Science is Meta gaming IRL. Humans are cheating fucks.

Khan Boyzitbig

  • Bay Watcher
  • [THOUGHTS:CHAOTIC] [ACTUALLY A SWAN]
    • View Profile
Re: Intercontinental Arms Race: Spring 1939 (Design Phase)
« Reply #1958 on: May 17, 2017, 10:02:19 am »

Quote
UF-39-APC "Croc": (3) NUKE9.13, Azzuro, evictedSaint
UF-40-H/MB-T 'Demolisher': (1) Taricus
UF-HAT-39-B"Vanguard": (1) Khan Boyzitbig

Knew I forgot something.
Logged
////;::;\\\\ Scuttle Scuttle...

Milk for the Khorneflakes!

Luminous Bolt of Bacon
"Excuse me sir, You are on Fire."

NAV

  • Bay Watcher
  • I have an idea!
    • View Profile
Re: Intercontinental Arms Race: Spring 1939 (Design Phase)
« Reply #1959 on: May 17, 2017, 10:06:53 am »

Quote
UF-39-APC "Croc": (4) NUKE9.13, Azzuro, evictedSaint, NAV
UF-40-H/MB-T 'Demolisher': (1) Taricus
UF-HAT-39-B"Vanguard": (1) Khan Boyzitbig
Logged
Highmax…dead, flesh torn from him, though his skill with the sword was unmatched…military…Nearly destroyed .. Rhunorah... dead... Mastahcheese returns...dead. Gaul...alive, still locked in combat. NAV...Alive, drinking booze....
The face on the toaster does not look like one of mercy.

evictedSaint

  • Bay Watcher
  • if (ANNOYED_W_FANS==true) { KILL_CHAR(rand()); }
    • View Profile
Re: Intercontinental Arms Race: Spring 1939 (Design Phase)
« Reply #1960 on: May 17, 2017, 10:07:01 am »

I forget, is the Raider solid against 20 mm's?

Azzuro

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Intercontinental Arms Race: Spring 1939 (Design Phase)
« Reply #1961 on: May 17, 2017, 10:07:11 am »

I like either Salamander or Bullfrog. Gator also sounds too derivative, and Duck just isn't impressive.
Logged

United Forenia Forever!

evictedSaint

  • Bay Watcher
  • if (ANNOYED_W_FANS==true) { KILL_CHAR(rand()); }
    • View Profile
Re: Intercontinental Arms Race: Spring 1939 (Design Phase)
« Reply #1962 on: May 17, 2017, 10:09:30 am »

Well, what about Piranha?

Wolfhunter107

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Intercontinental Arms Race: Spring 1939 (Design Phase)
« Reply #1963 on: May 17, 2017, 10:12:32 am »

I prefer calling it the Salamander.

My worry is that that it'll be outmatched by the gun raiders, now that they can cross water now, too.
Logged
Just ask yourself: What would a mobster do?
So we butcher them and build a 4chan tallow soap tower as a monument to our greatness?

evictedSaint

  • Bay Watcher
  • if (ANNOYED_W_FANS==true) { KILL_CHAR(rand()); }
    • View Profile
Re: Intercontinental Arms Race: Spring 1939 (Design Phase)
« Reply #1964 on: May 17, 2017, 10:26:12 am »

The Raider fires 30 mm's.  I suggest we up the armament to 37 mm's, which is about as big as we can get before it starts becoming a tank (or at least no more than 40 mm's to maintain anti-armor capabilities without capsizing).  The Raider has RHA, so it would need something of that caliber to stand a chance at pen'ing.

My suggested armament is a 37 mm autocannon with a 7.62 Sorria turret for anti-infantry abilities.  It wouldn't be too far fetched to have a 37 mm autocannon, since that was the armament of the Kingcobra.

Idea for Revision: Steam Catapult.  A steam-powered catapult to assist the Haast in takeoff in carrier operations.

@Sensei: what is preventing our carriers from launching night raids?
« Last Edit: May 17, 2017, 10:53:47 am by evictedSaint »
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 129 130 [131] 132 133 ... 500