Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Poll

Which team did you play in the last game?

Glorious Arstotzka
- 17 (16%)
Glorious Moskurg
- 13 (12.3%)
Ingloriously Didn't Play
- 76 (71.7%)

Total Members Voted: 106


Pages: 1 ... 217 218 [219] 220 221 ... 500

Author Topic: Intercontinental Arms Race: Finale  (Read 603595 times)

Kot

  • Bay Watcher
  • 2 Patriotic 4 U
    • View Profile
    • Tiny Pixel Soldiers
Logged
Kot finishes his morning routine in the same way he always does, by burning a scale replica of Saint Basil's Cathedral on the windowsill.

Khan Boyzitbig

  • Bay Watcher
  • [THOUGHTS:CHAOTIC] [ACTUALLY A SWAN]
    • View Profile
Re: Intercontinental Arms Race: Spring 1940 (Design Phase)
« Reply #3271 on: June 06, 2017, 06:29:34 am »

A 130mm with  50% boost to range will outrange a 152mm that lacks said boost. We are just about matching range with a 90mm thanks to rocket assisted shells. A 300mm would be able to match with something like the USS Iowa using our tech.
Logged
////;::;\\\\ Scuttle Scuttle...

Milk for the Khorneflakes!

Luminous Bolt of Bacon
"Excuse me sir, You are on Fire."

Sheb

  • Bay Watcher
  • You Are An Avatar
    • View Profile
Re: Intercontinental Arms Race: Spring 1940 (Design Phase)
« Reply #3272 on: June 06, 2017, 06:36:50 am »

Range isn't all, destructive power is also important. A 90 mm might as well be a pop-gun against a battleship.
Logged

Quote from: Paul-Henry Spaak
Europe consists only of small countries, some of which know it and some of which don’t yet.

Khan Boyzitbig

  • Bay Watcher
  • [THOUGHTS:CHAOTIC] [ACTUALLY A SWAN]
    • View Profile
Re: Intercontinental Arms Race: Spring 1940 (Design Phase)
« Reply #3273 on: June 06, 2017, 06:40:48 am »

And a 152mm is also. Their battleship is outgunned by light cruisers. Never mind Heavy cruisers or Battlecruisers.
Logged
////;::;\\\\ Scuttle Scuttle...

Milk for the Khorneflakes!

Luminous Bolt of Bacon
"Excuse me sir, You are on Fire."

Sheb

  • Bay Watcher
  • You Are An Avatar
    • View Profile
Logged

Quote from: Paul-Henry Spaak
Europe consists only of small countries, some of which know it and some of which don’t yet.

Khan Boyzitbig

  • Bay Watcher
  • [THOUGHTS:CHAOTIC] [ACTUALLY A SWAN]
    • View Profile
Logged
////;::;\\\\ Scuttle Scuttle...

Milk for the Khorneflakes!

Luminous Bolt of Bacon
"Excuse me sir, You are on Fire."

Sheb

  • Bay Watcher
  • You Are An Avatar
    • View Profile
Re: Intercontinental Arms Race: Spring 1940 (Design Phase)
« Reply #3276 on: June 06, 2017, 07:00:00 am »

Although I would appreciate a name change to follow superior Forenian naming conventions.
Logged

Quote from: Paul-Henry Spaak
Europe consists only of small countries, some of which know it and some of which don’t yet.

Madman198237

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Intercontinental Arms Race: Spring 1940 (Design Phase)
« Reply #3277 on: June 06, 2017, 07:43:23 am »

I'd go with something ENTIRELY different:

Coast defense? You're kidding, right?
At LEAST mount it on a warship to start. It'd be easy enough to strip down the Archer and mount more of a midsize cannon in a single mounting on it. What I mean is go for something closer to a 250mm gun, which can be revised past 300 if we ever go battleship, and then mount it in two single mountings on Archers.


But I don't want to see that.

UF-RAD-40 Ray of Deadlier Death
Using many advancements from the outside world and our own understanding of the technology, this giant leap in radar technology utilizes cavity magnetrons to shrink the size of radar arrays so an array can be mounted on a single truck and every one of our warships. The technology is further refined in weaker versions so that short-range gun-ranging radar sets can be installed on aircraft.
Logged
We shall make the highest quality of quality quantities of soldiers with quantities of quality.

Khan Boyzitbig

  • Bay Watcher
  • [THOUGHTS:CHAOTIC] [ACTUALLY A SWAN]
    • View Profile
Re: Intercontinental Arms Race: Spring 1940 (Design Phase)
« Reply #3278 on: June 06, 2017, 07:46:54 am »

Mount 2 250mm guns on a destroyer? You do realise that will capsize whenever it fires right? If we were to mount it on a warship literally only our carrier and new cargoship could carry it and not capsize on firing.
The 300mm is so that we can make a new warship for the gun next turn and downscale the guns for use on a destroyer.
Logged
////;::;\\\\ Scuttle Scuttle...

Milk for the Khorneflakes!

Luminous Bolt of Bacon
"Excuse me sir, You are on Fire."

Funk

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Intercontinental Arms Race: Spring 1940 (Design Phase)
« Reply #3279 on: June 06, 2017, 07:49:11 am »

A major flaw in our navy has been the lack of anything that can stand up in fight against there battleships and destroyers.
An ultra heavy battle ship would help our navy stand up to Cannala's navy and not just with draw once there's get close.
Logged
Agree, plus that's about the LAST thing *I* want to see from this kind of game - author spending valuable development time on useless graphics.

Unofficial slogan of Bay 12 Games.  

Death to the false emperor a warhammer40k SG

piratejoe

  • Bay Watcher
  • Obscure References and Danmaku everywhere.
    • View Profile
Re: Intercontinental Arms Race: Spring 1940 (Design Phase)
« Reply #3280 on: June 06, 2017, 07:53:24 am »

Quote
0 "Caviar Soup" support ship:
0 "Paralytic Sneeze" bombardment ship:
2 'Compensator' 300mm Coastal Gun: Sheb, Khan Boyzitbig, Piratejoe
0 "Caviar Soup Again?" support ship:
Fix the bloody name, other then that, its good.
Logged
Battleships Hurl insults from behind thick walls, Destroyers beat up small children, Carriers stay back in the kitchen, and Cruisers are a bunch of tryhards who pretend to be loners.

Madman198237

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Intercontinental Arms Race: Spring 1940 (Design Phase)
« Reply #3281 on: June 06, 2017, 07:56:45 am »

Quote
0 "Caviar Soup" support ship:
0 "Paralytic Sneeze" bombardment ship:
2 'Compensator' 300mm Coastal Gun: Sheb, Khan Boyzitbig, Piratejoe
0 "Caviar Soup Again?" support ship:
1 Ray of Deadlier Death: Madman198237

Logged
We shall make the highest quality of quality quantities of soldiers with quantities of quality.

evictedSaint

  • Bay Watcher
  • if (ANNOYED_W_FANS==true) { KILL_CHAR(rand()); }
    • View Profile
Re: Intercontinental Arms Race: Spring 1940 (Design Phase)
« Reply #3282 on: June 06, 2017, 07:59:30 am »

It seems our strategy of "skip battleships and rely on carriers" isn't working. 

At this point, we're trying to land on islands now.  We need a decent cruiser (CL or CH), a decent lander (although cheaper salamanders may help) and cheaper jets (through decomplexification).

This...seems like two turns worth of tech before we have a decent chance of taking an island.

Let's do the 300 mm coastal gun so we have something we can scale down forever.

Then let's revise complexity off the jet to compete with the spearhead.

Next turn, we can design a Light Cruiser to compete in the ocean.

And lastly revise the Archer as a lander so we can land on an enemy island for literally the first time this game.

Quote
0 "Caviar Soup" support ship:
0 "Paralytic Sneeze" bombardment ship:
3 'Compensator' 300mm Coastal Gun: Sheb, Khan Boyzitbig, Piratejoe, evictedSaint
0 "Caviar Soup Again?" support ship:
1 Ray of Deadlier Death: Madman198237




Khan Boyzitbig

  • Bay Watcher
  • [THOUGHTS:CHAOTIC] [ACTUALLY A SWAN]
    • View Profile
Re: Intercontinental Arms Race: Spring 1940 (Design Phase)
« Reply #3283 on: June 06, 2017, 08:01:49 am »

Quote
0 "Caviar Soup" support ship:
0 "Paralytic Sneeze" bombardment ship:
4 'Compensator' 300mm Coastal Gun: Sheb, Khan Boyzitbig, Piratejoe, evictedSaint
0 "Caviar Soup Again?" support ship:
1 Ray of Deadlier Death: Madman198237
Fixed the vote box a little, 1 vote wasn't tallied.
Logged
////;::;\\\\ Scuttle Scuttle...

Milk for the Khorneflakes!

Luminous Bolt of Bacon
"Excuse me sir, You are on Fire."

10ebbor10

  • Bay Watcher
  • DON'T PANIC
    • View Profile
Re: Intercontinental Arms Race: Spring 1940 (Design Phase)
« Reply #3284 on: June 06, 2017, 08:08:11 am »

Quote
It seems our strategy of "skip battleships and rely on carriers" isn't working. 

A result of the way the game works.

All designs only add to the battle strength, they never detract from it. The skip battleships and rely on Carrier strategy relies on the assumption that the Cannalan Carrier force is weakened to allow for the presence of their battleships. But rather than that, they get both the benefit of having carriers, and having battleships.


Quote
0 "Caviar Soup" support ship:
0 "Paralytic Sneeze" bombardment ship:
5 'Compensator' 300mm Coastal Gun: Sheb, Khan Boyzitbig, Piratejoe, evictedSaint, 10ebbor10
0 "Caviar Soup Again?" support ship:
1 Ray of Deadlier Death: Madman198237
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 217 218 [219] 220 221 ... 500