Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Detoxicated]

giving cyclone shield to the merchant (1): Detoxicated

[Kashyyk]

I feel we should think of ways to counter the Arstotzkan winters. We get penalties wherever that cold tower is, as well as the mountains and the taiga. Whilst turning everything warm enough to use the Hammer of Allah would be nice,  I think it would be more sensible to develop lightning snow storms and cold weather gear. 

Edit for vote:

sell cyclone shield [1]  detoxicated
sell detect thoughts [1] kashyyk

[Taricus]

The cold tower is in the mountains and seems to be able to focus it's effects on a region. Take the mountains and we take that tower. Nothing like a bit of global warming to heat up the Taiga >:D

[Detoxicated]

So far i have gathered these equipment ideas from all of us:
- Cold Weather equipment
- Boots of haste
- Camouflage Cloaks
- Hardened Armour
- Gust of Wind shields

If we found a way to generalize equipment enchanting it would boon us greatly if we actually invent all these things.

[Devastator]

If we found a way to generalize equipment enchanting it would boon us greatly if we actually invent all these things.

We have.  I mostly want to do adamantium so we don't need to design each enchanted metal item seperately.  As for warmth, inventing magic liquor comes to mind as a good way to do that.

[Taricus]

Adamantium would need the mountains, whereas just strengthening the objects in question will be useful for our weapons & armour without it.

[Devastator]

Adamantium would need the mountains

It would be required to get a +1 bonus to designing all metal items.  Since we don't have that, I want to keep the number of necessary metal-designs to a minimum.

[Taricus]

Well, we don't need to rely on the mountains bonus for anything but the really ambitious ones, especially if we can justify the plains bonus for the design anyway.

[Devastator]

Still, though, I don't want to have to make seperate enchantments for every object we make in the future.  That's why I want to go for magic metal.

[Taricus]

Doesn't have to be, just a general enchantment for our armour and a general one for our weapons and we're practically solid.

[Devastator]

Doesn't have to be, just a general enchantment for our armour and a general one for our weapons and we're practically solid.

Still seems like one too many.  And stacking enchantments might prove harder than making super metal and then designing an active spell to layer on top of it.  We might go in for metal ships, say, or steel golems or something in the future.  Enchant Armor might not apply to those, but a supermetal would.

[Taricus]

Maybe, but armour does work differently from weapons so getting the proper enchantment for that is going to take a little more.

And getting those will magnify the effectiveness of adamantine/adamantium markedly.

[Devastator]

Maybe, but armour does work differently from weapons so getting the proper enchantment for that is going to take a little more.

And getting those will magnify the effectiveness of adamantine/adamantium markedly.

I think one will help with experience, but at this moment a second one for weapons would be unnecessary, so we should try for the supermetal after doing one.

Plus, remember, if we botch the first roll, we won't need to get it fixed for the second design, just good enough for experience.

[Taricus]

Again, supermetal doesn't seem that worthwhile until we get the mountains, and again enchanting said supermetal weapon/armour will make it that much more effective.

[Devastator]

Again, supermetal doesn't seem that worthwhile until we get the mountains..

Why, exactly?