And yes, my case is that you're not behaving like Town!you, precisely because of all of this weird angery stuff. Town!Tiruin didn't get angery. Even undet similar statements.
:v
I'ma hug doll for his antiquarian efforts and point to many times when I was TOWN in the past in which I acted out of character, like Meph's Temple...mafia game thing. It had Dariush and I swore ;~;
They were not good times.
But I do not get... "angery" :v I do get frustrated. Angry is not something I've reached, essentially with how I remember my life with this vivid memory (and that I dislike it thanks to my background in being the recipient OF people like that) >_<
Also, this is practically insulting. We all know or at least suspect the truth at this point. Just commit to it.
...I'm pretty much following my wincondition as I am right now. :v
This should be given to you back. It's like saying the allegation is all the proof that is needed by that second sentence.
"You're acting weird D: You're scum!"
"No I'm not? Please give details to back that up?"
And I don't get any.
It's like saying being scum provides a change of behavior because the theme that the GM set gives that outlet.
It's implying that this is
warranted behavior just because this person can be one theme instead of the general notion of being 'town'.
It sets a precedent wholly unhealthy and gives a tone as if this person is
expected to act like one or the other--I would love to quote doll, because he gave word to ideas and feelings many have had but not precisely put down: People are unsure about me because I aim to be flexible within reason. Anger is not a sign of being scum, it is like
saying anger is the sign of the Sith *ahem* -removing the context of what one has read in that tone--if you see anger, what is the context? What is their intent? What if I ask about their intent; if they respond, is it reasonable?
If you mentioned before my reaction to your WOWROLEDEATH thing, I have mentioned it is to get a response. THIS isn't directly being used as a case but as an inferred reference, and even then it should be assumed since there is no effort to
be direct with what you're referring to.
>~<
Basically assuming somebody is scum without the context of where or what guides them to act that way, just because you felt they're acting out of character WITHOUT taking the effort to get to know why they're acting like that (I mean goodness I can mention a total RL incident like my {immediate} {pulling the double bind and being aggravating resulting in a personal breakdown} but does that even matter?)
Summary of my point: Make a case and verify it with integrity. Don't just point and call out behavior by that sake--the result of this game, and my alignment at that point, should not reinforce any of those biases.
It will not help your growth as a player, and in the bigger context of life, in your analytical aspect.
If you would like me to display the same behavior to you, I can...quote the last page of posts of yours. It is quite...silly.
But seriously there's a ton there I didn't understand whatsoever that it seems like you want to feel implied.
Author
Topic: Fallacy's BYOR 2: Game over! Post-game write up up. (Read 100180 times)