You're defending someone else. It looks like you're buddying up.
Defending how? She's merely speaking about what she thinks about her friend -- Cinder and flame99 and BHK are friends outside of Mafia, and I do know that while they communicate with each other over the internet, they've got integrity during gaming that they don't disclose anything or give any subtle hints at all towards their current gameplay to each other.
How is it buddying when one says 'This person is new, their background of Mafia is as such'?
And how is this kind of 'defending' seen by you
and webadict, although I get the reasoning for questioning her like that.
Just tell me the darn questions!
Alrighty O_O
First is while you've been tunneling on webadict, you have possibly and inevitably read other people's posts (unless for some reason you're scrolling your phone, finding the kinged penguin avatar and reading only that...), so thereby you would have situational awareness. Back in my post which I now realize is missing another darn tab because of my lolinternets, I would be
Unvoting because of having a difficult time in parsing your scumplay (and...mostly because of your comment in that one previous game that said 'I've been scum for 3 games consecutively' and I've checked back how you behaved then); this time has me seeing you as someone concernable, but leaning town recently.
Cinder:That behavior is, while admirable out of game, very scum-looking.
Also it's lime green bro, not teal.
That's just 3 more lines until Lime Green.
I am somewhat suspicious of the denser-than-usual impenetrability, manufactured pretexts, and accusations of me ignoring them that aren't particularly justified.
@4maskwolf below.
It's moreso that you never quoted me or even linked what I was saying despite 4mask having done so for you beforehand >_>
So that's how I interpreted me being 'ignored'; I have mentioned it as one way or another as non-scumtell or non-towntell and moreso how you behave which can lead onto adjusting those tells.
Was there anything 'impenetrable' or mystifying or nebulous about how I spoke?
4mask:Do you think it's just bad luck we can't understand Tiruin?
Bad luck?
I have no post restriction so everything I say can be scrutinized freely--I'd suggest direct communication as I am better read that way.
Because it didn't really hit me till now, and I'm not certain it's not just bad luck. And I originally voted Tiruin because they weren't answering my questions.
In comparison to what? I like that you've noticed something--and 'I wasn't answering your questions' because I missed them [and then did] :v
What do you feel about how I speak?
How so?
It depends both on personal reasoning and perspective really, this question is a good follow up when such is being suggested of your actions. :O
I have no idea what you're asking for here, but in the context I'm just going to assume you're asking for reads. Alright, here's all the non-null reads I have as of now.[...]
Danke!
To be followed up later.
Cinder: Neutral for one very specific reason: Cinder, BHK, and flame are apparently all dating, and honestly I don't think they should have joined a game together because I'm afraid it's going to skew their ability to find scum, especially if one or more of them are on the scumteam. But for that reason, I can excuse the defense of flame, at least this time.
I'll probably speak in as a third-party to their integrity, but despite all that, they're not the folks to ruin the game that way [because y'know, it's something pretty much important].
But I would love to see more from them. :I
You can't learn better if you don't expose with guidance--and y'all got yourselves to guide you.
Tiruin:Deus Asmoth: Can I ask a read list from you thus far given possible passive observation from you? Do you think there's
I think there might be something missing here. As regards reads, I was kind of hoping to get the secrets of the universe from webadict, but since that hasn't happened yet I'll have to muddle through.[...
I'm a squeaky boot x.x
It was to be 'Do you think there's [it was to be reworded on inquiring your impressions given people's claims and how to work with a Kingmaker-variant]'
Webbywubs (~'u')~[...]
Webadict:Webadict:A rolename is a much higher price than I'm asking. I never granted my own, so I do not expect as such from you.
If you wish to pay such a high price, however, there is a much better chance that I can reward something to your delight. But it may be dangerous to know the True Name of a man. Many things can be done to those that know such knowledge.
So, be wary.
Pff. True names are only headology.
My name is Esmerelda Weatherwax. They call me Granny, or the Hag o' Hags, or K'ez'rek d'b'duz, or Aaoograha hoa. I am Good, because I do what is Right. I am not Nice, and I can't be havin' with that sort of thing.
Show me what you got.
Hmm, that's a tricky one... THE Granny Weatherwax! She would want many things and nothing, though she'd never willingly tell me either.
Do I need to ask you for some information specifically, or is there a pre-selected lucky dip I can get my prize from?
Answering this question is going to paint a target on my back, but you gave your role name, so it's a fair trade to answer this: Yes. I have an inventory of items to give away, and these items are based on flavor from your role. I have an action that allows me to determine the exact item to give to a player, but this would limit my ability to do so.
And, I'll go one step further. This is a limited selection of items I have:
A [REDACTED].
A geology textbook.
A pair of binoculars.
A [REDACTED].
A sturdy pickaxe.
A basket of herbs.
A [CANADIAN REDACTED, EH].
A megaphone.
A set of [REDACTED] with [REDACTED] on them.
A [REDACTED].
A charm bracelet.
A pair of purple boots.
Redacted items are explicitly dangerous items, that I feel uneasy sharing.
:V
I feel like you're some kind of merchant
of Venice and I just made a silly reference to Civilization V that is just me being silly.
That said, you mentioned many things
to yourself.
So finally people get to see how I note down things! I don't usually type them like this but my own presumptions towards this Day1, especially in a Kingmaker role variant, information is needed.
Note of flavor; possibly also a note on expressing one's flavor in a way that may intrigue the other party. Very clever if town, same similarity if scum although considering if scum, it's moreso targeting or otherwise can be used as a foil.
Webadict helpfulness. That bit that gave me the town indicator back in the previous game [Meph's Paranormal] >_> I like kindness ;~;
But it's only one thing in the pool of water.
Nice flavor post; reminds me of this
one Monty Python sketch (uploaded by the original) which led me to thinking about him as a Merchant of Venice
"A thing for your time."
This is placed at the bottom
because of the recency effect because of how it's best connected to how I figure, that list is presented. Webbywubs may have a compliment-sort of 'Intel' (
Reference Mephansteras' Paranormal; spoiler "Intel") kind of thing, it may also not be and just a clever move from him--but one desirably having me seeing him as town for all its effort as in comparison to scum, it doesn't seemingly have that much benefit.
The mention of True Names has me recalling one of those classic books where mysticism and fantasy abound x3. This however can be parsed as 'role name' in which you--inasmuch as I presume from my own role--have a name in BOLD. Which inevitably matters in these games,
Newbies take note, as in past games there have been abilities that are specifically and exactly measured to work if 'the wielder knows {x}' of another person, and such things as 'the role name' or 'the name of the ability they have' were appropriate.
...And/or I seriously got heavy Fallen London vibes >_> [context is "Fallen London" is like a classical text-based game, heavy choices of mysteriousness and very well done writing, with very
harsh consequences must one push their curiosity so far. It is very well done if you write "Do not do this" because it's a narrative method]
This denotes that web's ideas are for town only, so it's a kind way of saying 'clever' move for scum--which would, if ever, also intrigue scum players...unless they're the KILLY type >_> I'm unsure why the later paragraph was added as it can help pretty much catch scum as compared to intrigue-if-mentioned, if Web is town/third-party//non-mafia. Although it also works as place if he is Mafia in turn.
webadict: why did you add that latest paragraph there?Of course, naturally, this only applies to Town players only. No offense 3rd partiers and scum, but I'm afraid the only information you have dies with you.
This comes off more like you're a third-party given that kind of saying.
This was his 'last freebie' of information. I am really giddy if you're town to sample your wares, but after browsing through my notes I'm also wary of some kind of 'xenozoologist' (See: Meph's link up there) given its 'free samples' and 'equality' notes.
Given information trading (while it'd also be more of role fishing
and given it's cleverness, it leans down town), color me obliged! Could I ask if your task is day or night acted?
I do however believe that this isn't just a clever bluff if scum, and mightily beneficial if town or even third-party webbywubs, as I can see part of my current modifications in his list.
...Presumably >_> since FoU had fun with my role. [/grumble]
I have no idea but it feels right.
TBF: I asked you a question.
webadict: So it's Smstr w/ Love all over again, eh?
...while I am familiar with Smstr w/ Love, can you refresh me on that? :v
I think I won there. But I'm forgetful and/or can't find it given our local search engine.
Okay so....
While having quotes is nice, it's the explanation and analysis of the quotes that actually counts. You need to explain _why_ you find these quotes scummy, as opposed to just posting them.
While I can see how it may be confusing,
you never bothered to quote those in the first place, TBF. :VSo I was just all
wondering what you are even referring to--especially given several of your posts back then being only a response [so I'm lost as to what you're even responding to, too!]