in this case, the constitution simply states that the supreme court is the supreme court, and enumerates what classes of cases it will decide on.
Specifically:
Article III.
Section. 1.
The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour, and shall, at stated Times, receive for their Services, a Compensation, which shall not be diminished during their Continuance in Office.
Section. 2.
The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority;—to all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls;—to all Cases of admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction;—to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party;—to Controversies between two or more States;— between a State and Citizens of another State,—between Citizens of different States,—between Citizens of the same State claiming Lands under Grants of different States, and between a State, or the Citizens thereof, and foreign States, Citizens or Subjects.
In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction. In all the other Cases before mentioned, the supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction, both as to Law and Fact, with such Exceptions, and under such Regulations as the Congress shall make.
The Trial of all Crimes, except in Cases of Impeachment, shall be by Jury; and such Trial shall be held in the State where the said Crimes shall have been committed; but when not committed within any State, the Trial shall be at such Place or Places as the Congress may by Law have directed.
Since the issue of persons leaving one state (where abortion is not legal) to go to another (where abortion is legally protected) to obtain an abortion, falls squarely within these enumerated classes-- Namely "—to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party;—to Controversies between two or more States;"..."— between a State and Citizens of another State", to which the controversy of abortion applies to all three-- the SCOTUS's ruling on Roe-v-Wade is a legitimate case to be heard and decided by the SCOTUS, and this new decision only just causes this kind of case to be forced to be decided YET AGAIN in the future-- The constitutionality of the Roe v Wade case is unquestionably within the scope and purpose for which the SCOTUS was established, **IN THE CONSTITUTION**.
Asserting that the SCOTUS hearing and deciding on Roe v Wade is somehow unconstitutional, is clearly made by somebody who apparently has reading comprehension problems.
Now, as relates to RIGHTS, which the constitution has the 9th amendment, which reads:
Ninth Amendment
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
which is in accordance with what would be within the United States Bill of Rights-- which has this to say:
Article the third... Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
(Meaning that the personal religious views of certain members of government shall not be interpreted to be the law of the land, and that no such laws respecting a specific religious view are to be enacted.)
AND--
Article the eleventh... The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
EG, just because it is not specifically cited, does not mean it is not a right, and attempting to assert such a position is forbidden by the bill of rights. (JUSTICE ALITO.)
As you can clearly see, the text in the constitution is not at all unreasonable, and in fact, is completely counter to the notion set forth in the preliminary decision by the SCOTUS about Roe v Wade.