I know what it says, I was being hyperbolic when I said all of them were drinking bleach, that part was a joke.
As for rigor:
Survey questions were administered by Porter Novelli Public Services and ENGINE Insights on May 4, 2020, through PN View: 360,* a rapid turnaround survey that can be used to provide insights into knowledge and practices of targeted audiences. This opt-in Internet panel survey was administered to 502 U.S. adults aged ≥18 years using the Lucid platform (3); panel members who had not taken a survey in the previous 20 waves of survey administration were eligible to participate. Quota sampling and statistical weighting were employed to make the panel representative of the U.S. population by gender, age, region, race/ethnicity, and education. Respondents were informed that their answers were being used for market research and could refuse to answer any question at any time. No personally identifying information was included in the data file provided to CDC.†
19% of the sample put household cleaners on their food, 18% washed their hands with it, 10% misting themselves with cleaners, 6% inhaling it directly, 4% drinking or gargling bleach. Even accounting for overlaps, those added up to 39% of the sample, with the 25% suffering measurable ill effects.
So yeah, I was poking fun at these people by simplifying things a bit, but this makes it no better.
Of all Americans in this internet survey, yes. We need to ask more questions about these people- internet trolls, news article comments section dwellers, people strapped into the information age data feed without the wherewithal to limit the bullshit? Office drones, preteens, Welshmen pretending to be American? It's an opt-in survey, what vetting is being done?
It was a CDC survey. I'd assume the CDC, with their job being to collect a lot of data have quite a bit of experience with sample selection. A large well-funded and experienced organization, for whom 99% of their job is getting this sort of sampling data. You'd kind of assume they have experience at this.
Also, if people
aren't really drinking bleach and you pick random people the odds of picking only bleach-drinking people in your sample would be very very low. Unless you somehow included a large pro-bleach-drinking bias into the study.