Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Loud Whispers]

...Huh. Is there evidence for this claim?

[Trolldefender99]

Anyway gonna not debate with bernie supporters, most are mad cause they got called out by CNN, NYtimes and hillary clinton. Like arguing with racists, its useless. Gonna keep on going and keep the eye on the prize of beating trump in 2020. And its looking good for a lot of the candidates, but with so many states to go its still a tossup.

I actually donated to andrew yang's campaign, but its looking pretty dead in the water. I might throw in a donation to warren, since I like her a lot. But I'm gonna wait to see how the campaigns progress for the winners and ones who did not do so good.

(edit: And the only time I'll bring it up one last time. Yes the evidence is hillary clinton's interview and the CNN and NYtimes articles. I already linked the article to hillary clinton's interview and she has no reason to lie she was honest in the whole interview, and its been widely spread with his remark on warren so that is a little of a tossup of how he said/she said)

[sluissa]

Just popping in to say that this is hilarious. Most I've laughed all day.

[nenjin]

And here people thought the Republicans would be tearing themselves apart.

[Trolldefender99]

...Huh. Is there evidence for this claim?

I'll bite.

In case you missed it

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/21/us/politics/hillary-clinton-bernie-sanders.html

It might not be bernie himself, but the culture around him as stated by hillary clinton.

Now going back to supporting real candidates. Last time I bother replying to bernie supporters, that even hillary clinton called many of his supporters out on. Its like arguing with trump racists.

[SalmonGod]

Anyway gonna not debate with bernie supporters, most are mad cause they got called out by CNN, NYtimes and hillary clinton. Like arguing with racists, its useless. Gonna keep on going and keep the eye on the prize of beating trump in 2020. And its looking good for a lot of the candidates, but with so many states to go its still a tossup.

I actually donated to andrew yang's campaign, but its looking pretty dead in the water. I might throw in a donation to warren, since I like her a lot. But I'm gonna wait to see how the campaigns progress for the winners and ones who did not do so good.

(edit: And the only time I'll bring it up one last time. Yes the evidence is hillary clinton's interview and the CNN and NYtimes articles. I already linked the article to hillary clinton's interview and she has no reason to lie she was honest in the whole interview, and its been widely spread with his remark on warren so that is a little of a tossup of how he said/she said)

K

You go be satisfied with that level of informedness, I guess.

[TamerVirus]

Protip: The real reason behind the Iowa caucus 'irregularities' is to hide the fact that Andrew Yang got 100% of the vote.

Every single one.

[SalmonGod]

Protip: The real reason behind the Iowa caucus 'irregularities' is to hide the fact that Andrew Yang got 100% of the vote.

Every single one.

Damn.  TamerVirus has no reason to lie.  Link to this post saved as evidence for future discussions.

[Trolldefender99]

Protip: The real reason behind the Iowa caucus 'irregularities' is to hide the fact that Andrew Yang got 100% of the vote.

Every single one.

I don't think he actually has much support tbh, he never really did or caught on. He had a very small slice of the pie so to speak. His selling pitch of everyone gets a fixed income is a little out there for most people I think. Some of his comments about himself as an asian was also kinda stereotypical and kinda kept people away. But I think that was kinda a minor thing. I just think he doesn't have that charisma and oomph that a lot of people like in a candidate and he didn't really have any big things besides the fixed income. Kinda a one off sell point and not much else.

[Loud Whispers]

I'll bite.
In case you missed it
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/21/us/politics/hillary-clinton-bernie-sanders.html
It might not be bernie himself, but the culture around him as stated by hillary clinton.
Now going back to supporting real candidates. Last time I bother replying to bernie supporters, that even hillary clinton called many of his supporters out on. Its like arguing with trump racists.

Yeah I missed it, I'll give it a look. Please argue in good faith however, this forum isn't Fox or CNN ;p

Protip: The real reason behind the Iowa caucus 'irregularities' is to hide the fact that Andrew Yang got 100% of the vote.

Every single one.

Nah, Jeb Bush was polling as 100%

[Trolldefender99]

I'll bite.
In case you missed it
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/21/us/politics/hillary-clinton-bernie-sanders.html
It might not be bernie himself, but the culture around him as stated by hillary clinton.
Now going back to supporting real candidates. Last time I bother replying to bernie supporters, that even hillary clinton called many of his supporters out on. Its like arguing with trump racists.

Yeah I missed it, I'll give it a look. Please argue in good faith however, this forum isn't Fox or CNN ;p

Protip: The real reason behind the Iowa caucus 'irregularities' is to hide the fact that Andrew Yang got 100% of the vote.

Every single one.

Nah, Jeb Bush was polling as 100%

fair enough I did come off as a bit aggressive. But as said, as hillary said, it may not entirely be bernie but just the culture around him which wouldn't entirely be his fault. Sorry for the aggressive tone though, I think arguing with trump trolls on comments on various news sites got me adapted to that line of debate which isn't actually appropriate anywhere else and this forum. Again sorry for the aggressive attitude, I'll tone it down a lot of notches.

[MrRoboto75]

Protip: The real reason behind the Iowa caucus 'irregularities' is to hide the fact that Andrew Yang got 100% of the vote.

Every single one.

Nah, Jeb Bush was polling as 100%

please clap

[Loud Whispers]

No worries fam, we're all cool here, whatever the political aisle. At its worse we will be stubborn and well-set in our views, but I think we've gotten good at keeping shit civil

Protip: The real reason behind the Iowa caucus 'irregularities' is to hide the fact that Andrew Yang got 100% of the vote.

Every single one.

Nah, Jeb Bush was polling as 100%

please clap

[sad airhorn noises]

[Trolldefender99]

No worries fam, we're all cool here, whatever the political aisle. At its worse we will be stubborn and well-set in our views, but I think we've gotten good at keeping shit civil

Protip: The real reason behind the Iowa caucus 'irregularities' is to hide the fact that Andrew Yang got 100% of the vote.

Every single one.

Nah, Jeb Bush was polling as 100%

please clap

[sad airhorn noises]

Well I'm gonna have to get going so my last post for a bit.

But..

To be fair and honest though, I'd still vote for bernie if ends up the nominee. Anyone is better than trump. Gotta get him out. I know everyone has their preferred candidate though so I respect others preferences and opinions. Everyone is gonna have some controversy of some kind around them, whether its small or big since no person is perfect. I just like warren a lot more. I just wasn't expecting bettigieg to do so well. Don't think many people expected that as far as I know. But in the end, I'll vote whoever isn't trump.

Though I'm most surprised biden did so poorly. He tends to top national polls, so maybe its a one off state or a sign his campaign is losing oomph. I know for a long time he was regarded as easily the number one candidate, but that seems not to be a thing now in general.

[dragdeler]

-