Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 2092 2093 [2094] 2095 2096 ... 3566

Author Topic: AmeriPol thread  (Read 4207154 times)

MrRoboto75

  • Bay Watcher
  • Belongs in the Trash!
    • View Profile
Re: AmeriPol thread
« Reply #31395 on: July 31, 2019, 08:41:34 pm »

Candidates are cultivated

What a poor harvest this year
Logged
I consume
I purchase
I consume again

Naturegirl1999

  • Bay Watcher
  • Thank you TamerVirus for the avatar switcher
    • View Profile
Re: AmeriPol thread
« Reply #31396 on: July 31, 2019, 08:49:05 pm »

Yes, I hope the worse ones will be taken out of the race rather than being funneled to the top like in 2016
Logged

Trolldefender99

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: AmeriPol thread
« Reply #31397 on: July 31, 2019, 10:18:37 pm »

Its not looking good sadly for the more moderate democrats. Seems the far left are getting more support, which to me is as bad as the far right. Obama wasn't far left, he was pretty moderate, and biden is pretty moderate along with a bunch of candidates from 1st debate but all are rather losing these debates. I'll never vote trump, but I'd never vote for anyone on the far left either. So that leaves many moderates who would vote for neither radical side kinda out in the dark unable to really vote.
 
Still time to go, but getting worried. I'm hoping Biden or Harris ends up making it to the end, but we'll see. Biden did do a ton better than his 1st debate he did, but flaundered in some places.

To add though, I'd rather have hillary back if biden or harris doesn't make it. The other moderate candidates don't seem to be doing nearly as good as them two. Hillary wasn't extreme left either, pretty moderate like obama and reminded me a lot of him in her policies. Too bad she lost to trump.

To further add. Trump has stated he hopes someone with far left views goes up against him. It be like two completely opposite radical ideologies going up against each other. it be going right into his play book and what he is hoping for. Even CNN has had tidbits in their recent article of saying that as well.

Where as someone like Biden already has a ton of support, especially from the african american, hispanic and even the cuban communities (where cubans heavily voted for trump and one reason florida went red). Plus a good part of the vote from the undecided/independents that can often change how an election goes. Harris I'm not sure has the same amount of support, I don't hear much about that about her. Maybe she does.
« Last Edit: July 31, 2019, 10:38:54 pm by Trolldefender99 »
Logged

Frumple

  • Bay Watcher
  • The Prettiest Kyuuki
    • View Profile
Re: AmeriPol thread
« Reply #31398 on: July 31, 2019, 10:33:35 pm »

Sanders apparently hit the centrist candidates from the top rope, so I'm satisfied.
I'unno, from what I've been picking up from chatter sanders didn't do too well overall. Better than most of the second stringers, but that's not saying much.

On the other hand, warren apparently decapitated someone on live TV or... something.

Its not looking good sadly for the more moderate democrats. Seems the far left are getting more support, which to me is as bad as the far right.
Something like 70% of the extremist murders in the US are far right -- over 80% if you include muslim extremist stuff among them. Less than a tenth are left. Meanwhile we see the results of rightwing policy regularly. Poisoned water, crumbling infrastructure, even more wealth inequality, rampant abuses, flagrant  corruption, and so on. Perhaps unfortunately (given what it entails about some "moderates" in the US), what amounts to the far left in the US isn't, actually, nearly as bad as the far right. By any metric save maybe "leave us alone so we can fuck over minorities and poor people".

... so far as genuinely far left goes, as opposed to lukewarm "sanders counts" american nonsense, well, there wasn't really any of those on stage. Good few years out from that really being on the table at all, probably...
Logged
Ask not!
What your country can hump for you.
Ask!
What you can hump for your country.

Trolldefender99

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: AmeriPol thread
« Reply #31399 on: July 31, 2019, 11:05:06 pm »

Sanders apparently hit the centrist candidates from the top rope, so I'm satisfied.
I'unno, from what I've been picking up from chatter sanders didn't do too well overall. Better than most of the second stringers, but that's not saying much.

On the other hand, warren apparently decapitated someone on live TV or... something.

Its not looking good sadly for the more moderate democrats. Seems the far left are getting more support, which to me is as bad as the far right.
Something like 70% of the extremist murders in the US are far right -- over 80% if you include muslim extremist stuff among them. Less than a tenth are left. Meanwhile we see the results of rightwing policy regularly. Poisoned water, crumbling infrastructure, even more wealth inequality, rampant abuses, flagrant  corruption, and so on. Perhaps unfortunately (given what it entails about some "moderates" in the US), what amounts to the far left in the US isn't, actually, nearly as bad as the far right. By any metric save maybe "leave us alone so we can fuck over minorities and poor people".

... so far as genuinely far left goes, as opposed to lukewarm "sanders counts" american nonsense, well, there wasn't really any of those on stage. Good few years out from that really being on the table at all, probably...

democrat cities do tend to be a lot better. Though many democrat cities end up having the opposite end of the issue, the high quality living for most people is too much for many to afford so there ends up being a massive homeless population. LA and san francisco as two examples, are both amazing cities but are incredibly high in the amount that are homeless. I'd be homeless if didn't still live with my parents, since my disability wouldn't even cover a month of rent let alone all the utilities/bills+food+other expenses. Where as if I lived in a dirty republican state, I could afford a HOUSE (which can't do at all in california) on my own, pay the entire bills/rent and still have enough money left over for other stuff. But point is that democratic cities often end up having their own issues but I do agree do tend to be vastly better in quality living. Except like LA like I said, has a massive homeless problem going on right now, at least last I heard a month or two back. And from what I got out of LA time, the people who can do something about it are ignoring it and not trying to solve the issue.

Though I haven't seen anywhere socialism has succeeded anywhere. Which is actually what I mean by the far left. I know it came out of a form of communism or communism was based on it, a lot of the stuff socialism is direct out of the communism playbook or maybe its vice versa, a lot of similarities between the two. Socialism is pretty much communist-lite though in any case. Just painted differently. But socialism itself in whatever form it takes hasn't really succeeded anywhere. UK has their form of socialism but is a huge police state and they treat words as a bigger crime than being a pedo or murderer. But UK has always been rather controlling of their pop, being once a monarchy and all, so that isn't much to say. Venezuala is a socialist dictatorship and failed. Cuba has some form of socialism, russia embraced some form of it or came up with it, its one of the two (again I know its one or other) and that failed. Their entire government collapsed under it and it took them a long time to get rid of it, but it has other issues now. Pretty much socialism and communist pops up and the country/government collapses. And then people just try to do it again in another place not and say it'll be different this time lol.

I know this is what trump ends up wanting in 2020 and he even said as much, and if it ends up that, its likely gonna be a very shitty 4 more racist dirtbag years.

But a lot of the moderate democrats were obviously opposed to that in the 1st debate, but they don't stand a chance at nomination. Just not enough support. Biden doesn't go that route either, more in line with hillary and obama. Same with kamala harris.  Biden being the far more likely of the two (him and Kamala) to win. Especially since kamala has flip flopped quite heavily, but we'll see. I think Biden would easily beat trump, and like I added to my post above, he has a lot of support from a lot of communities.

(edit: Though I should clarify. Some socialist aspects aren't so bad like republicans like to say. Some nations in europe do pretty well, though like sweden is more a hybrid of capitalism and socialism more than an actual full socialist nation like cuba or Venezuela. So aspects of socialism can be great, when combined with things like capitalism in a way that is good for everyone and not just the super rich. But to me that is more moderate democrat policies, like obama and hillary's policies she wanted to do. So a place like sweden is an example where aspects of socialism can still be good, but not the overreaching aspects of some of it. Pretty much obama/hillary/biden policies to sum it up).
« Last Edit: July 31, 2019, 11:27:06 pm by Trolldefender99 »
Logged

Doomblade187

  • Bay Watcher
  • Requires music to get through the working day.
    • View Profile
Re: AmeriPol thread
« Reply #31400 on: July 31, 2019, 11:32:58 pm »

@Troll

Okay, first things first, let's get this out there:

Nobody in the top of the Democratic field is further left than Labour, as far as I can tell. The frame of what is left and right is so fucking skewed in the US that the "far left" doesn't really exist. Red scare and all.

Now, politics!

Kamala Harris and Biden still have a good shot, and are probably policy similar, tbh. Harris's policies (on her own) are fairly neoliberal, referencing her student loan debt relief plan specifically.

Warren and Sanders I prefer because they have actual tax plans.

Also, Sweden, Denmark, and all: they're pretty goddamn socialist relative to us, and a single socialist president is barely going to shift us, tbh.

I just want an actual center between left and right, not conservatism.

Re Ipsil:
Time to update the Constitution, fix up this shit.

And get more than two goddamn parties.
« Last Edit: July 31, 2019, 11:34:54 pm by Doomblade187 »
Logged
In any case it would be a battle of critical thinking and I refuse to fight an unarmed individual.
One mustn't stare into the pathos, lest one become Pathos.

Doomblade187

  • Bay Watcher
  • Requires music to get through the working day.
    • View Profile
Re: AmeriPol thread
« Reply #31401 on: July 31, 2019, 11:40:00 pm »

Those aren't outs, though. Those just prevent going in. We're too late for those options.
Eat the Rich?
Logged
In any case it would be a battle of critical thinking and I refuse to fight an unarmed individual.
One mustn't stare into the pathos, lest one become Pathos.

Trolldefender99

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: AmeriPol thread
« Reply #31402 on: July 31, 2019, 11:44:02 pm »



And get more than two goddamn parties.

The rest of your post I took out was good and I do agree with it. Though I brought up sweden only because its (from what I've read anyway, so take it what it for what its worth, since I don't live there. Just bbc, swedish local news and some friends there) is because its less socialist than other parts of europe, but again I don't have first hand knowledge so maybe I'm not correct in the slightest. Who knows what my friends prefence to politics is over there, besides I know they think trump is a red headed red butted buffoon lol

But what I left in your post. This. So much this. So many parties in various european countries, and each actually has a chance to win and accomplish things. Some do form coalitions to ally with each other, but even the lesser parties can still do things and many "small" parties can end up winning.

Where as here in US, none of the independents will ever or can win. Its only democrat and republican. Literally only two parties. Where as UK, other nations in europe, they all have a whole bunch of parties, and I know australia even is the same way. I think that is far more successful than what the US has. Solves a whole ton of problems. Maybe not 100% perfect, but don't think anything can be anyway.
Logged

Doomblade187

  • Bay Watcher
  • Requires music to get through the working day.
    • View Profile
Re: AmeriPol thread
« Reply #31403 on: August 01, 2019, 12:04:05 am »

Logged
In any case it would be a battle of critical thinking and I refuse to fight an unarmed individual.
One mustn't stare into the pathos, lest one become Pathos.

smjjames

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: AmeriPol thread
« Reply #31404 on: August 01, 2019, 12:45:33 am »

Honestly, I just don't know anymore. Personally, I support Warren for the trust-busting stuff in tech, but I cannot actually envision what that presidency would look like after 4 years. I can't envision what it would look like after any one of these candidates, or even Trump, win and hold power for 4 years.

You get rhetoric from Republicans that paint Democrats as attempting to destroy democracy itself, and that their dismantling of checks and balances are necessary to safeguard the foundation of the Republic from that threat. Then you get rhetoric from Democrats saying that they need to actually respond to the threat of Republicans for once as they attempt to destroy this country's foundations by sacrificing certain checks and balances to keep Republicans from enacting their agenda. I mean, hell, how many candidates have a position on goddamn court-packing?

The worst part is that I can't even say that they're wrong in taking up that rhetoric. The whole situation is a hellish loop- both sides, accusing the other of destroying democracy and saying what parts of the system they must dispose of so that they can keep the other from accomplishing their goals of... disposing parts of the system to keep the other from doing the same. Democrats packing the Supreme Court in retaliation against Republicans packing the entire judicial system to prevent Democrats from pushing through laws that would remove Republican gerrymandering, et cetera.

It's a spiral, and I can't see the bottom. I don't even think the election matters anymore- clearly there are more than enough scapegoats in the House and Senate to vilify entire halves of the country, and checks and balances are holding up well enough that the whole country remains in deadlock rather than collapsing in either direction. However, I don't think who specifically holds the Presidency will matter; the only thing that does is whether there's enough political support for them in the House and Senate to start eroding those checks and balances in their favor, to defend themselves from the opposition doing the same the moment they can.

The whole thing is the collapse of the iterated prisoner's dilemma. At this point, the only winning option is to betray, betray, betray, because that's what the other side expects and will betray you back before you have the option to not do so. No candidate can run on cooperation because no one on the other side actually believes them, and will sink any attempts at cooperation before they can even begin just to be certain that they can keep things in deadlock long enough that they can wipe out the opposition for good. As far as things are concerned in the Capital, deadlock is better than passing anything that favors the other side, even a little. This isn't Trump's fault; this isn't Obama's fault. We've been trending in this direction for a long time, but only now is it apparent that this is no aberration. The US political system is in a full-on death spiral, and I don't see any way out beyond just hitting the bottom.

I can't see the bottom from here.

More importantly though, will we recognize that we’ve hit rock bottom when we hit it? Or rather, do we know what rock bottom looks like? I know there have been many comparisons to the collapse of the (Western anyway, the Eastern trundled on for another thousand years) Roman Empire, but it’s far from a perfect parallel. We aren’t going to be invaded by barbarian hordes (and no! bad Republicans! immigrants are not the Roman barbarians!) for one.
Logged

Baffler

  • Bay Watcher
  • Caveat Lector.
    • View Profile
Re: AmeriPol thread
« Reply #31405 on: August 01, 2019, 03:40:45 am »

It may be more charitable than you're willing to be with him, but if you want to make him a historical figure the best fit IMO is Georges Ernest Boulanger. It's not a perfect fit but the parallels are there, especially the central thrust of "unable to translate popular support into political success due to near-unanimous opposition by the nation's elite and his own lack of gravitas." If the USA has to be Rome I'd say he's Tiberius Gracchus, but I honestly wouldn't stand by the comparison, it's the closest I can think of but they're still very different.
« Last Edit: August 01, 2019, 03:42:32 am by Baffler »
Logged
Quote from: Helgoland
Even if you found a suitable opening, I doubt it would prove all too satisfying. And it might leave some nasty wounds, depending on the moral high ground's geology.
Location subject to periodic change.
Baffler likes silver, walnut trees, the color green, tanzanite, and dogs for their loyalty. When possible he prefers to consume beef, iced tea, and cornbread. He absolutely detests ticks.

Frumple

  • Bay Watcher
  • The Prettiest Kyuuki
    • View Profile
Re: AmeriPol thread
« Reply #31406 on: August 01, 2019, 06:56:34 am »

That... central thrust isn't accurate, though. Like... at all. Trump's enjoyed popular support at basically no point in his administration, not even at the time of his election. Much of his efforts have been disliked by at-minimum a plurality of the country, and often enough a majority or supermajority. The support of national elite has been more or less the only thing that's driven his shit over a finishing line instead of getting mired in something due to a great number of people -- and not even remotely primarily a national elite -- bloody hating whatever it is.

It shows, too, really. Very little of his efforts have been particularly popular, and most haven't exactly been terribly good for anyone except a subset of fatcats.
« Last Edit: August 01, 2019, 06:58:25 am by Frumple »
Logged
Ask not!
What your country can hump for you.
Ask!
What you can hump for your country.

wierd

  • Bay Watcher
  • I like to eat small children.
    • View Profile
Re: AmeriPol thread
« Reply #31407 on: August 01, 2019, 07:03:15 am »

Money talks.

That this is able to happen should be taken for the sign (that it rightfully is) that the Oligopoly is real, and has subverted the democratic process of this country.  Naturally, those oligarchs dont want to lose that power, so they will lie, swindle, and "Lobby" to ensure that their views about what a healthy economic sector looks like stays around, and that their power remains unchallenged.

(Really, we should break up all those mega-banks, and mega-corporations. We established Anti Trust laws for a reason.)
« Last Edit: August 01, 2019, 07:06:22 am by wierd »
Logged

Frumple

  • Bay Watcher
  • The Prettiest Kyuuki
    • View Profile
Re: AmeriPol thread
« Reply #31408 on: August 01, 2019, 07:15:16 am »

It probably would be nice if anti-trust got bigger teeth, aye. Lot of our business et al regs could stand that, heh. Coulda' stood it years ago.

Ain't gon' come from the party of "deregulate all the things!", though. Substantial shit's pretty hard to get through the rest of the country, too, but it's at least relatively more viable on those fronts. Functional fucking non-starter with GOP wards politicians, unless you can somehow figure out how to disenfranchise minorities in the process or somethin'.
Logged
Ask not!
What your country can hump for you.
Ask!
What you can hump for your country.

wierd

  • Bay Watcher
  • I like to eat small children.
    • View Profile
Re: AmeriPol thread
« Reply #31409 on: August 01, 2019, 07:19:23 am »

The DNC wasn't any better.  They gleefully repealed Glass-Steagall you know.  Insisted such protections were no longer necessary-- that they were a hindrance to the economy. 

Then 2008 happened.


I'm not trying to say that the DNC likes to drink the blood of babies and burn minorities in fires like the GOP seems to like, but that they are equally co-opted by the oligarchs orchestrating these kinds of bullshit actions.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 2092 2093 [2094] 2095 2096 ... 3566