I would say that this is inappropriate, because of learned helplessness.
If you are unfamiliar with the concept, it is what happens when people are placed into a circumstance that they have no recourse for, through being forcibly subjected to, and punished for seeking redress for. The clinical research was initially conducted with dogs getting electric shocks.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Learned_helplessnessBullying in workplaces or schools (such as for being gay, or being overweight; conditions that are not really something a kid is able to redress themselves in any meaningful capacity) combines these elements. It has both incapability to prevent or avoid (Children are trapped at school by legal requirement, Workers are statistically trapped by economic factors, as an alarming percentage of the workforce lives hand to mouth and cannot endure missing even a single paycheck) and reprisal for seeking redress (bullied EVEN HARDER for being a snitch, in the case of school, or given negative repercussions from HR in many workplace situations.) This conditions the recipients of such conditions to become INCAPABLE of seeking solutions to the problem. It does not significantly galvanize the population for effective, voluntary change.
Such voluntary change requires reinforcement of some kind.
The exact kind of reinforcement needed will be intimately specific to the psyche of the individual in question, so a panacea is not realistically feasible. (It is best to avoid the whole deleterious environment from the beginning, rather than try to clean it up after.)
Due to the intimately specific nature of that needed reinforcement, the best person to know what reinforcement is needed is the individual themselves, and again-- either axiomatic true belief obviates any sense of urgency or need, sunken costs fallacy distorts the scope of the problem sufficiently that the individual does not seek, or-- if bullied, learned helplessness reinforces a position of inaction, and ownership of the misery of the condition as an identity.
Short of very strongly minimizing the potential for these modes of entrapment, there isn't a quality stratagem outside of one-on-one counseling that I see as viable. I might be wrong, and I hope I am, but I do not currently see one.