Why let others dictate the bounds of your hypothetical so much that it comes with artificial scarcity and object-possession-status-scores built in?
Yes, if you started today you'll get lots of people who think the goal is to have the most stuff, and indeed to get so much stuff you could never even access it in any realistic fashion.
This is not some sort of biological imperative, we are assholes because we are taught assholish things. I make things because I enjoy the act, I enjoy the result, and while I prefer gifting things to others who enjoy them, I am comfortable with selling things to make it easier to do my own thing. Money is a lubricant, an annoying one, and I never hated my situation more than I did when I briefly experimented with trying to accumulate it.
Now I have new freedoms, new skills, I have things which are uniquely and undeniably my own to use and possess, but also to appreciate for the time and effort I used to turn wood and metal into beautiful new things to help make other beautiful things with. They are rare, indeed they are currently unique, but they are supposed to be first steps in a chain of forms and refinements, I would argue they are less valuable currently than they would be if anybody who wanted one of my things was able to have that thing.
Communism was never supposed to be a goal or competitor against capitalism, it was supposed to be a chrysalis which enabled something new to exist and replace it.