O, Since we are going to quibble, let's quibble. I will use YOUR EXACT LANGUAGE, and just fill in some blanks. The ONLY thing I will not take at face value, is the assertion that Fascism is ultraconservative. (It most certainly is ultranational.)
So, let's begin.
You state this:
It is in their very philosophy that that which does not coincide with the traditions (the traditions they want to uphold, at least) of the nation should be slaughtered.
I pointed out how a leftist fascist regime could systematically perform "Forced realignments" (in the same vein as was done to gay people in the past), since the actual natural status of vocational desire does not "Coincide with the traditions of the nation"-- EG, the enforcement of the 50-50 vocational split, and the false narrative that this is defacto sexism if left unaddressed.
Yet, somehow, that is "Just totalitarianism", and not Fascism.
Really, the ONLY difference is the nature of what constitutes the nature of "Traditions". Or, what constitutes the nature of "slaughtered." (Since I guess being forcibly changed into something you are not, and do not desire to become, is somehow not a death of personhood.)
As for your edit--
The example you have cited, does not follow the pattern defined, despite claiming to.
The pattern, again, is:
We can return to X (A fantastical, fictitious ideal that never existed to begin with), IF ONLY---
In the case of Nazi Germany this was "We can return Germany to the glorious days of our Aryan ancestors, IF ONLY we can exterminate the impurities from within our ranks!"
Those Aryan ancestors, NEVER EXISTED, and the impurities likewise, were simply political rivals, or those that held differing viewpoints, or worse-- knew that the aryan myth was in fact a myth.
So, now better informed about what the structure of the statement *IS*, let's examine your counter argument, and see why it does NOT fit that pattern.
Take a libertarian perspective, for example. The state needs taxes to survive, and the liberal government has raised taxes. But if I don't pay taxes despite making income, I will be arrested by the state. Therefore, the state is Fascist, as they believe they can return to stability via the raising of taxes and return to their idealized liberal utopia, and will use violent force to detain those who betray their ideals via tax evasion.
"return to stability via raising taxes, and return to their idealized liberal utopia, and will use violent force to detain those who betray their ideals via tax evasion."
This, after IMMEDIATELY opening that taxes are indeed a REAL necessity, and not a totally fictitious narrative.
Yes-- THOSE ARE TOTALLY THE SAME THING. /s