I'd just like to interject that Fields hasn't been charged with terrorism, and I sort of feel it's jumping the gun to say it was a terrorist attack. The guy's a diagnosed schizophrenic, and until his trial he isn't going to get any chance to defend himself.
I'm not trying to make excuses for the guy; I personally feel he's a murderous asshat. But, until there's been an investigation and a trial, nobody'll know for sure what actually happened.
Yeah, see, while if you're asking my legal opinion I'd agree with that, in context of our POTUS? Nah man. This is the exact sort of thing he shat on the mayor of goddamn london for, and if he waited for an investigation on that one it's news to me. The definition of terrorist I'm rolling with right now is the same one he used, and probably being used more cautiously.
Regardless of what the legal definition is, or what the man is eventually convicted of, so far as our president is concerned, the POTUS is acting to downplay the actions of a group that had one of their members commit what he has called, and stridently, terrorist attacks. So I'll keep calling them that, because that's the context our nazi sympathizing craven shit in chief is working from.
E: Incidentally, my still living grandfather
may happen to be a WW2 vet, and for all his faults one of the people in my life that I respect the most, and who has done the most for me. This is shitting on him, it's shitting on his fellow military that killed and died to stop that ideology, and it's shitting on this country and every other one, including the one we fucking
nuked, that were fucked by the sort people folks in that rally were marching with. There
may be some vitriol at this point.