By the way, the investigation turned up nothing.
Just to check, but you do realize that article is not saying that, right?
Law enforcement officials say that none of the investigations so far have found any conclusive or direct link between Mr. Trump and the Russian government.
Seems to pretty clearly be nothing to me.
Might want to read it a few more times, then. Unsourced "law enforcement officials" pointedly
not mentioning the existence of not yet conclusive or indirect links is very, very far from the FBI or investigators directly involved stating on the record that the investigations found nothing. That the closest thing in that article to something like that (the bit specifying no direct connection to russian election operations, which is again very different from "nothing") was very specifically worded, also implies something (that the writer was spinning things for something very specific,* at the absolute least).
Also probably worth noting the article was from back in October, when the media in general was in full fuckery mode. It shows. Title completely unsupported by content, nebulous claims trying to insinuate more than they're actually saying, digressions littered throughout about shit that had little to nothing to do with the specific subject, all the usual mess trying to blow something up far beyond what they have grounds to actually do. FTFE
*And no, I'm not saying they were trying to spin things in one way or another political bias wise. Reader attention and article dissemination, though...