Believe it or not I was actually trying to research if there was a non-biblical reason why a one world government is a bad thing (even if properly implemented). Since... I always thought that is kind of the final stage of lasting world peace.
Observe how corporations have consolidated their hold over public influence, in politics, media and finance. Observe how the distinction between businessman and statesman is increasingly meaningless. Then implement that in a world government; total subjugation, total power consolidation, with no chance of escape except through a global insurgency against the global government. What measures would such a global government employ to ensure insurgents had no environment in which to exist? The whole dystopia and curiously enough utopia genre exists for this reason. Compare the Island with Brave New World, one in which drugs are used to usher in enlightenment, another in which drugs are used to keep people too pacified and pleasured to understand their subjugation. One has communal living to protect children from unalloyed exposure to the individual neuroses of any parents, the other does so in order to better aid psychosexual elimination of individuality within society from the youngest age. The list goes on, utopia and dystopia, heaven and hell, good and evil have often resembled one another. It is an interesting topic, one which you can explore to a great range - I'm interested, what ideal model did you find, what is its proper implementation and how could it be done?
Kind of like how when the UK started to do Brexit... They realized... they had no real reason to do Brexit... but are going to do it anyway.
I beg to differ Neonivek, and you'd do well to realize John Oliver represents more Progressives than he does Britons, please spend 10 seconds to check BBC news and read any of the Prime Minister's statements.
It was, in the end, an objection to the idea of Brexit more than the policies and government of it... (Which yes, they complained about... But don't... actually want to change it)
Brexit is WEIRD!!!
Pardon? Do you have any facts to back up any of your assertions?
I think it amounts to not wanted to be told what to do as well as the knowledge that they couldn't back out of policies.
I suppose a global government would need to source its legitimacy with which to command the human race very carefully, or else find itself facing total revolt.
Yeah I can understand it NOW being a bad idea... but why is it a sort of end times entity?
Why is it a freeken boogeyman?
Because it would be the single most powerful political entity ever created? Do you not see why people would be concerned with doing it right or doing it not at all? Jesus Christ mate
Needless to say, many people aren't cheerleading for the death of their culture.
Though, oddly and sadly, many actually are.
Demoralization is a powerful condition