I'd like first to step in and say that world wars do not start for small reasons.
Aye, my comparison was for the sake that world wars, the greatest escalation of human conflict, were started over less - thus putting the prospect of escalation on the American scale in perspective
They do not, have not, and if they follow the pattern, will continue to not be for small reasons.
Nor would an American spring have its factions fight for small reasons, however a conflict starting over small reasons and escalating to greater conflict has been par the course cross the world for fair bit of human history, from riots to revolutions
If all you saw on St. Vitus' day, 1914 was the spilling of blood of an important noble by a radical nationalist, you missed the point. I mean what, did you think World War One started because Great Britain, France, Italy, and Russia all really, really jived with the goals of Yugoslavism, or because they wanted to defend Serbia or such nonsense? Or that Germany, the Ottoman Empire, Bulgaria; all these nations really agreed with Austria-Hungary doing whatever? Nonsense.
Yes, I really think all the Great Powers sent their best men to die in the trenches for the sake of one man
Lol no, conflict triggers are not the same as the underlying factors which allowed them to arise. These brawls wherein people are being hospitalized would be alike the riots of previous American years, wherein much property damage would be done, people hospitalized and arrested but things returning more or less to normal later - were it not for these underlying factors. The USA has drawn its battle lines and the weaker faction has shown stunning willingness to attack the faction upon which it depends upon for its physical security, a situation which would rapidly devolve into barbarism at the suspension of the rule of law - which would not happen for as long as civil butthurt did not turn into civil discontent. With the clashes of antifa and the right, followed by the steady convergence of neo-fascist groups into a consolidated organization, coupled with the tacit silence of partisans and the difficulties in policing the USA, in the event of these brawls turning into murders shit will hit the fan - the mainstream partisan groups on left and right need only join the combat in sufficient numbers so as to dramatically alter the power balance of the USA, without even needing to mobilize a majority of people
What was it in the American Revolution, 30% supported independence, 30% supported Britain, 40% watched to see who would win. Only in this case it would not be a fight, it would be a massacre considering the sheer discrepancy in capabilities of the two, one which would leave the USA in a dark pit tbh
I'm not sure that I need be worried about Berkeley, frankly. Provocateurs fighting provocateurs do not alone a fire make. Sparks with no tinder.
One man gets hospitalized, antifa is sweeped from the streets, responds with reorganization and armament to prepare for round two. With both street brawlers having the backing of their partisan allies, the potential for backlash should there ever come a moment where two brawling factions bring guns to a streetfight is fire while the USA is the gunpowder